AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Ming-Yin Scott

ACC105 · ACCT105 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you can learn accounting entirely from the textbook on your own.

Best fit · Self Taught ProNo time for questionsLecture-onlyRefers to the bookUnable to transfer knowledge
  • Students report she refuses questions in and after class due to time and safety excuses.
  • Lectures are pure content dump with almost no worked examples or practical application.
  • Knowledgeable on paper but fails to help students understand the material.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

No grade data and high difficulty ratings suggest an A takes real effort with little instructional help.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Students rate difficulty high and while racing through chapters.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Both reviews slam teaching quality and describe a professor who will not help students.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

No grade outcomes reported; .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Comments focus .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students say she blocks questions, skips examples, and cannot transfer knowledge.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

no Q&A, no examples, and students sent back to the book.

Main concern

No support for questions and almost no practical examples in class.

What students said

“She never had time for students questions.”
ACCT105
“she is unable to transfer her knowledge to student.”
ACC105

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She never had time for students questions.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting blocked questions and lecture-only teaching. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 No Room for Questions

18/100

“You couldn't ask during classes because "there wasn't enough time to answer questions and cover the material"”

📚 Lecture Dump, No Transfer

15/100

“she is unable to transfer her knowledge to student.”

📉 Low Recommendation

15/100

“There is no practical application in class she just concentrates on fours of straight lecture.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She never had time for students questions.
  • Very few problems were done as examples during class
  • she just concentrates on fours of straight lecture.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Support

  • She doesn't address students lack of .
  • She refers you to the book.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two old reviews from 2012-2013 with consistent complaints but tiny sample and no grade data.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ACC1051 review
ACCT1051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values