AI Rate Professor

Social Science

M Meysenburg

SOCIOLOGY101 · POLYSCI110 · SOC101 · SOCIOLOGY · SOC1 · SOC110 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid unless ; lectures add little and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProExtremely BoringOff-Topic LecturesTextbook-Only ExamsNice but UselessHard Tests
  • Students widely call him extremely boring and say lectures go far off subject.
  • Exams are hard and drawn almost entirely from the textbook, not lectures.
  • and often empty, but that does not fix the teaching gap.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

and curves exist, but many report hard textbook exams, failed classes, and grades that .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is basic intro sociology for many, but lectures confuse and if .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

88/100

Multiple students say he does not care if you attend and that few people show up.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most reviews because he does not teach the subject and classes are painfully boring.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

, and curves help some, but hard exams and failed grades .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Light

72/100

, yet reading the full textbook for exams is still required.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Students repeatedly say he is nice but boring, off-topic, and does not teach sociology effectively.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Grades hinge on hard textbook-based tests more than useful lecture work or .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person SOC courses are described as boring monologues that wander off topic while .

Main concern

.

What students said

“This teacher is nice, but does not teach very well. This class is very boring, but the .”
SOC101
“Bottom line... !! I failed.”
SOC101
“You have to read the book to do good because .”
SOC110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are hard, highly specific, and based on the textbook rather than lectures.

Textbook-Based ExamsHard TestsSpecific Questions

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as hard and textbook-driven with little lecture alignment.

Textbook-Based ExamsHard TestsMake-Up Tests Allowed
“the and .”
SOC101
“ .”
SOC101
“ .”
SOC110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This teacher is nice, but does not teach very well. This class is very boring, but the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 in-person reviews spanning 2002-2012, highlighting boredom, textbook exams, and weak recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

😴 Extreme Boredom

15/100

“If you !”

📚 Textbook Not Lectures

30/100

“You have to read the book to do good because .”

👎

22/100

“Bottom line... !! I failed.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He talks about everything except for Sociology.
  • he doesnt even teach the subject
  • All he does is talk and talk all class long.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • the and .
  • IF YOU READ THE BOOK THEN YOU'LL GET A GOOD GRADE.
  • ATLEAST I GOT MY C!

Theme 3

🚪

  • He doesn't care if you go to class or not.
  • You don't even need to go to class. .
  • at least he lets u sleep

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen older in-person reviews from 2002-2012 are consistently negative on teaching quality, though many lack grades and .

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 56
2 out of 53
1 out of 57

Course coverage

SOC10111 reviews
SOC1102 reviews
POLYSCI1101 review
SOC11 review
SOCIOLOGY1 review
Show 1 more courses
SOCIOLOGY1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values