AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Eva Mendez

POLSCI110 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

Avoid unless you only need a low-effort political science credit and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProBoring LecturesLimited KnowledgeExam HeavyEasy ContentBook Dependent
  • Students report limited current-events knowledge and boring lectures.
  • Course content is easy if you can endure class and study the book.
  • Assessment .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Student says the class is easy if you sit through lectures and rely on the book for .

All ; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

80/100

Difficulty rated 1 and the comment explicitly calls the class easy aside from endurance of lectures.

All ; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

All ; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Low quality rating plus criticism of limited knowledge and boring lectures undercuts recommendation.

All ; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

No harsh-grading comments; ease is framed around content and effort rather than .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

70/100

Main load is three exams covering five chapters each plus book and lectures, not heavy weekly work.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Student says knowledge was limited, current events ignored, and lectures boring.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Passing is tied to three exams each covering five chapters from book and lectures.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and knowledge limited, but the class easy if you sit through it and use the book for .

Main concern

Instructor seemed unaware of current events and lectures were described as boring.

What students said

“not aware at all on current events. her knowledge was limited. easy if you can sit through her boring lectures and comments.”
POLSCI110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is three multi-chapter exams requiring the book and lecture material, with .

Three ExamsFive Chapters EachBook Plus Lectures

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person review describes three exams, each covering five chapters, needing book and lectures; .

Three ExamsFive Chapters EachBook Plus Lectures
“need book and lectures to pass 3 exams, each containing 5 chpts.”
POLSCI110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“not aware at all on current events. her knowledge was limited. easy if you can sit through her boring lectures and comments.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review from 2005, highlighting knowledge gaps, boredom, and . Credibility rating: Low.

😴 Lecture Quality

30/100

“not aware at all on current events. her knowledge was limited. easy if you can sit through her boring lectures and comments.”

📚 Course Ease

80/100

“easy if you can sit through her boring lectures and comments.”

📝

78/100

“need book and lectures to pass 3 exams, each containing 5 chpts.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • not aware at all on current events. her knowledge was limited.
  • easy if you can sit through her boring lectures and comments.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • easy if you can sit through her boring lectures and comments.
  • need book and lectures to pass 3 exams, each containing 5 chpts.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Single review from 2005 with limited detail and no corroborating opinions.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

POLSCI1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values