AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Katherin Brandt

ADN252 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you will prepare for patients; she is tough at first but highly valued.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClinical favoriteWants you preparedIntimidating at firstVery smartInformative
  • Student calls her one of the favorites in the nursing program.
  • She seems intimidating early, then clearly wants students prepared for patients.
  • Strong praise for being smart, informative, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

if you know your patients, but preparation is clearly required.

All ; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Clinical nursing work is standard challenge with mid-range difficulty and prep expectations.

All ; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Clinical shifts and attendance.

All ; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Student wants her for all clinical rotations and ranks her among favorites.

All ; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Expectations are high for patient prep, but problems disappear when you are ready.

Format shift

All .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Clinical prep for patients keeps workload real but not described as overwhelming.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Called very smart, informative, and a .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Clinical readiness and exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One in-person clinical review praises Brandt as a but fair if you know your patients.

Main concern

Only one review, so broader course patterns are unconfirmed.

What students said

“Brandt has to be one of my favorites in this program.”
ADN252
“She was very intimidating first day of clinical, but once you have her a few shifts, you realize she just wants you to be be prepared.”
ADN252

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe clinical preparedness checks rather than a .

Clinical Evaluation

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and being prepared each shift.

Clinical EvaluationPatient Prep
“If you know your patients, there won't be a problem.”
ADN252

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Brandt has to be one of my favorites in this program.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person clinical review, highlighting preparation standards and strong favorability. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“She is very smart and informative.”

💪 Prep Expectation

58/100

“she just wants you to be be prepared. If you know your patients, there won't be a problem.”

👍 Recommendation

90/100

“I wish I could have had her for all clinical rotations.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is very smart and informative.
  • she just wants you to be be prepared.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • one of my favorites in this program
  • very intimidating first day of clinical

Theme 3

📈 About Clinical Expectations

  • If you know your patients, there won't be a problem.
  • I wish I could have had her for all clinical rotations.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Single 2012 clinical review with strong detail but no corroborating sample.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ADN2521 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values