AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Joyce Robinson

CD106 · CD102 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

unless you can handle heavy writing and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy Paper WorkRushes PowerPointsUnfair GradingSelf-Teaching RequiredToo Many Observations
  • Both reviews rate quality low and warn against taking her classes.
  • Workload includes a 17-page paper and .
  • Students , and grades unfairly while they teach themselves.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Heavy papers, rushed lectures, and work hard.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

and weak instruction create a tougher experience than expected.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

; the main pain points are workload and lecture pace.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Both reviews strongly discourage enrollment and call the classes a waste of time.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students report and poor preparation for assessment success.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

18/100

A 17-page paper plus many observation assignments with insufficient time dominate the experience.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

20/100

Reviews , and leaves students teaching themselves.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Long papers and frequent observation assignments carry the course more than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person child , and poorly supported, with students reporting self-teaching.

Main concern

Extreme paper and and .

What students said

“She required a 17 page paper on Nutrition Health and Saftey. you can work with a partner but still its a lot of work”
CD102
“DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASS!!! This professor is no good. She , and assigns too many observation assignments without giving sufficient time.”
CD106

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment emphasis is on large papers and observations; .

Heavy PapersObservation AssignmentsNo Study Guides

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students cite a 17-page paper and .

Heavy PapersObservation AssignmentsNo Study Guides
“She required a 17 page paper on Nutrition Health and Saftey.”
CD102
“does not provide study guides, and assigns too many observation assignments without giving sufficient time.”
CD106

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASS!!! This professor is no good. She , and assigns too many observation assignments without giving sufficient time.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews focused on workload and weak instruction. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“I am practically teaching myself. Does not prepare u well or grade fairly.”

📚 Workload Load

18/100

“She required a 17 page paper on Nutrition Health and Saftey.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

12/100

“ !!! This professor is no good.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • still its a lot of work I didn't think needed to me done
  • Does not prepare u well or grade fairly.
  • assigns too many observation assignments without giving sufficient time

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She
  • I am practically teaching myself.
  • huge waste of my time

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

30/100

Evidence confidence

and detailed, but the tiny sample limits confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CD1021 review
CD1061 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values