AI Rate Professor

Biology

Angelica Abanes-De Mello

BIOL101 · BIO101 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you want a challenging bio class with a and are ready to study hard.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerClear ExplainerHard ClassHelpful After ClassLong LecturesMixed Teaching Reviews
  • Biology content is hard and requires real studying
  • Positive students praise clarity, humor, and one-on-one help
  • Older critique calls her inexperienced and a bad teacher

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Students say you must really study for a hard class, with no evidence of free or effortless As.

; no online reviews exist.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Multiple difficulty-4 ratings and comments call it a hard class that requires serious study.

; no online reviews exist.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

available comments.

; no online reviews exist.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Two strong positive reviews are offset by one harsh early review calling her a bad teacher.

; no online reviews exist.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

; difficulty is high and grades appear to require real study.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Long three-hour lectures, hard study load, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Most recent , though one early review strongly disagrees.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Comments emphasize lectures, partner exercises, and study for a hard .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and partner work, plus strong praise for clarity and help.

Main concern

Difficulty is high and one review strongly questions teaching quality early in her career.

What students said

“ and funny. Knows a lot and .”
BIO101
“Hard class (gotta really study) but .”
BIOL101
“good person but bad teacher.”
BIO101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize a hard, study-heavy course with long lectures rather than explicitly student-friendly exams.

Hard Class StudyLong LecturesPartner Exercises

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person bio requires heavy studying with long lectures and partner exercises; .

Hard Study LoadLong LecturesPartner Exercises
“Hard class (gotta really study) but .”
BIOL101
“Lectures were long (3 hours!) but I enjoyed doing the partner exercises the most.”
BIOL101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Hard class (gotta really study) but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews with mixed praise and critique. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“ and funny. Knows a lot and .”

📚 Course Difficulty

28/100

“Hard class (gotta really study) but .”

❤️ Support & Kindness

80/100

“She would talk with me after class and in email and we would go over any problems I had.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and funny
  • Lectures were long (3 hours!)
  • good person but bad teacher

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Hard class (gotta really study)
  • Boosted my self-confidence
  • she tries to be a hard ass

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She's funny (mostly making fun of herself) and very kind
  • Always look forward to her class!
  • she if fresh out of grad school and completely annoying

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

40/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews from 2006-2011 with mixed tone and no grade data limit reliability.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

BIO1012 reviews
BIOL1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values