AI Rate Professor

Economics

. Ebiali

ECONOMICS · ECON102 · ECON202 · ECON101 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid unless you already know econ and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerIncomprehensible LecturesTough EconAccent BarrierHarsh After ExamsHelpful If You Ask
  • Most reviews stress that lectures and accent are very hard to understand.
  • Course is difficult with heavy graph-based testing and dense material.
  • A minority say he helps when asked and factors effort and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Tests and dense material make an A hard; effort and but do not make them easy.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Students call the class hard with too much material and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

Attendance and effort are said to affect grades, but .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Most reviewers because lectures are incomprehensible.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

He may count effort and , but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Dense coverage and difficult assignments make the course feel heavy for many students.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

A few praise help and care, but most cannot understand him and some report demeaning comments.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tests on graphs and shifts dominate, with studying required because covered material appears on exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

because of pace, accent, and dense material, with mixed reports on help versus harsh classroom comments.

Main concern

Students cannot reliably understand lectures or expectations.

What students said

“The professor was very difficult to understand and he lectures so much the .”
ECON101
“After the and stupid we were.”
ECON101
“Little bit of an accent but all around he is a great teacher.”
ECON102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams focus on graphs and covered lecture material and are widely described as hard; .

Graph-Based TestsMaterial Directly on ExamsHard Assignments

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and shifts with hard, dense material; reviews do not clearly prove webcam or lockdown proctoring.

Graph-Based TestsMaterial Directly on ExamsHard Assignments
“ and shifts, but but is incomprehensible.”
ECON101
“Everything he covers is on the test, so studying is important.”
ECON101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Truly one of the . Too much material ro cover and youre lucky if you understand anything he says.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 in-person reviews spanning 2003-2011, highlighting comprehension barriers and difficulty. Credibility rating: Medium.

🙉 Hard to Understand

36/100

“very hard to understand”

📉 Tough Course Load

28/100

“Unless .”

🤝 Help Available If You Ask

48/100

“He really wants his students to learn and takes the time to help students who don't understand the material.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • challenging to understand him
  • if one is not afraid to ask
  • he didn't clarify very well.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I took this online and it was VERY HARD!!
  • He takes effort and attendace into consideration for grades
  • and shifts

Theme 3

💬 About Classroom Tone

  • he told the class how lazy and stupid we were
  • but is incomprehensible
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Eight older reviews (2003-2011) are consistent on comprehension problems but form a modest sample with limited grade detail.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ECON1013 reviews
ECON1023 reviews
ECON2021 review
ECONOMICS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values