AI Rate Professor

Automotive Technology

P. Jelinek

AUTO103 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid this instructor for AUTO103; expect off-topic lectures, heavy book work, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerOff-topic lecturesHeavy homeworkLittle lab timeWrong level contentAvoid
  • Only review says he wastes class talking about his life and teaching lower-level content.
  • Students must buy hard book and workbook with a lot of homework and minimal lab.
  • The reviewer dropped despite loving cars, signaling a poor auto tech experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

and misaligned content make progress hard; the student dropped rather than grind for a grade.

Only one in-person review; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

Rated maximum difficulty with wrong-level teaching and .

Only one in-person review; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

; class time is described as lecture-heavy and low value.

Only one in-person review; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

The only and that the student dropped a loved subject because of him.

Only one in-person review; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

25/100

; heavy HW and failed experience led to dropping the course.

Format shift

Only one in-person review.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Hard book plus workbook with a lot of homework and little lab time.

Format shift

Only one in-person review.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Off-topic life stories, wrong course level, forgetful, and almost no useful lab instruction.

Format shift

Only one in-person review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

and workbooks dominate; labs are minimal.

Format shift

Only one in-person review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Single in-person AUTO103 review , and .

Main concern

You pay for advanced auto but get basic lecture and .

What students said

“He sucks he spends most of the semester talking about his life and teaching you Auto 101 when your enrolled in Auto 103.”
AUTO103

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! He sucks he spends most of the semester talking about his life and teaching you Auto 101 when your enrolled in Auto 103.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting off-topic teaching and lab shortfall. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫

10/100

“ ! He sucks he spends most of the semester talking about his life and teaching you Auto 101 when your enrolled in Auto 103.”

🔧 Lab Shortage

15/100

“you only get about 1 hour of ”

📚 Heavy Materials

22/100

“He has you buy the hard book and the work book, alot of HW.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • spends most of the semester talking about his life
  • teaching you Auto 101 when your enrolled in Auto 103
  • forgets alot of things

Theme 2

📈

  • He has you buy the hard book and the work book, alot of HW
  • you only get about 1 hour of
  • and I love cars it's my world.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Single old review provides a vivid but non-replicated signal, so confidence stays low.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

AUTO1031 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values