AI Rate Professor

Law

Andre Quintero

LAWUGH · BOARDRIO · GREED101 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.7

The decision

scores and replace-him comments.

Best fit · Self Taught ProShould Be ReplacedNeeds RecyclingVery Low QualityAvoid
  • All three quality ratings are 1/5 with open calls to replace or recycle him.
  • Course difficulty looks low, but students still reject the overall experience.
  • Comments are short, old, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

72/100

Difficulty ratings are mostly very low, so content does not appear hard, but no grade outcomes confirm a free A.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

82/100

Average difficulty is only about 1.7 with two difficulty-1 ratings, so content challenge looks low.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Every review is a quality 1 and students say he needs to be replaced or recycled.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

; only low difficulty and very low quality ratings.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

70/100

Low difficulty scores and textbook mentions suggest a lighter course load, not a heavy grind.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students give all 1/5 quality scores and say he should have been replaced long ago.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviewers across BOARDRIO, LAWUGH, and GREED101 all gave quality 1 and said he should be replaced or recycled.

Main concern

Students openly want him replaced; teaching experience is the main risk.

What students said

“Needs to have been replaced a long, long time ago!”
BOARDRIO
“Needs to be recycled!”
LAWUGH

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring rules.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Needs to have been replaced a long, long time ago!”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting unanimous quality-1 rejection. Credibility rating: Medium.

💥 Teaching Disaster

12/100

“Needs to have been replaced a long, long time ago!”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

8/100

“Needs to be recycled!”

📘 Content Difficulty

82/100

“Course DIFFICULTY rating: 1”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Needs to have been replaced a long, long time ago!
  • Needs to be recycled!
  • Boo is too good!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Course DIFFICULTY rating: 1
  • Course DIFFICULTY rating: 3

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Three consistent bottom-tier ratings strengthen the negative signal, but comments are short and from 2008-2009.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

BOARDRIO1 review
GREED1011 review
LAWUGH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values