AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Ngatha Nyaggah

ENGT101 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid unless you already know drafting tools and can handle a very heavy workload alone.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy WorkloadPoor FeedbackSkips FundamentalsHard Teaching Style
  • Students say she skips drawing tool basics and leaves beginners lost.
  • Workload is described as extreme, forcing students to miss work.
  • and many are told to switch instructors.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Very high difficulty, heavy work, and and uncertain.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

Difficulty is rated 5 and students say the load forces sick days from jobs to keep up.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, though the heavy workload implies constant pressure to show up prepared.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Students call her a terrible instructor and urge taking a different professor instead.

Negative recommendation comes only from the in-person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

No grade data, but and harsh overall experience suggest little cushion.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Students report a lot of work and even calling out sick from jobs just to keep up.

Format shift

Workload complaints are from the single in-person review.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

, and students strongly prefer another instructor.

Format shift

All teaching critique is from the one in-person review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Comments center on heavy assigned drawing work rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Students report missing , and call her a terrible instructor.

Main concern

Beginners without prior drawing-tool skill may fall behind quickly.

What students said

“She didn't bother to discuss basic drawing tool fundamentals. If you are not familiar with drawing tools, good luck!”
ENGT101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe exam format for this engineering graphics course.

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews ; focus is on heavy drawing assignments.

Heavy Assignment Load
“Assigned A LOT of work. Many students would call out sick from their job just to try & keep up in class.”
ENGT101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Terrible instructor! . Halvorson instead.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting teaching gaps and heavy workload. Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Quality

22/100

“She didn't bother to discuss basic drawing tool fundamentals.”

📚 Workload Pressure

12/100

“Assigned A LOT of work. Many students would call out sick from their job just to try & keep up in class.”

🚫 Recommendation

18/100

“Terrible instructor! . Halvorson instead.”

Theme 1

🛠️ About Teaching Gaps

  • didn't bother to discuss basic drawing tool fundamentals
  • good luck!

Theme 2

💣 About Workload

  • Assigned A LOT of work
  • call out sick from their job just to try & keep up
  • Terrible instructor!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

30/100

Evidence confidence

One detailed negative review is consistent internally but too small a sample for high confidence.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGT1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values