AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Steven Johnson

CHEM110 · CHEM120 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if ; skip if you need organization and study guides.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTest heavyLecture heavyMixed qualityExtra credit availableNo study guides
  • Two chem110 reviews praise helpful labs and fair exams if you study; one Chem120 review calls him disorganized and unprepared.
  • and often track textbook challenge problems or .
  • Grades reported as B across reviews; experience seems course-dependent rather than consistently strong.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

All reported grades are B and , so an A needs solid studying rather than low effort.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty ratings sit mid-to-high and students stress reading, slides, and .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

One student while .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Two strong yes votes for chem110 clash with a loud do-not-take Chem120 review.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Students call him a , but reported grades are B not free A territory.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Test-heavy and lecture-heavy .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Helpful and clear for some chem110 students, but Chem120 feedback describes low effort and disorganization.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Exams are described as about two-thirds of the grade with test-heavy tags and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person chem110 students found him helpful with fair exams if they studied; Chem120 student reported heavy homework off-syllabus, no study guides, and poor organization.

Main concern

Course quality swings hard by section; Chem120 feedback is strongly negative on organization and effort.

What students said

“ and easy if you studied. Prof. Johnson was always willing to answer questions and ”
chem110
“DO NOT TAKE THIS PROFESSOR. Expect in class”
Chem120

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

if you study, and sometimes include but no study guides.

Test heavyBased on textbook challenge problemsBased on lecture slidesNo study guidesExtra credit on exams

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exams dominate grading, pull from textbook end-of-chapter problems or slides, and offer occasional without study guides.

Test heavyChapter challenge problemsSlide-based examsNo study guidesExtra credit on exams
“ each chapter”
chem110
“ if you put in the work and study the slides. and ”
chem110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Expect MANY homework assignments on material that was not covered in class, no study guides for exams, and an .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting mixed teaching quality and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Prof. Johnson was always willing to answer questions and ”

📝

72/100

“Exams are 67% of grade so if .”

⚠️ Organization Risk

30/100

“an adjunct professor who puts little effort into the course.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing professor very lecture heavy
  • always willing to answer questions and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and easy if you studied
  • if you put in the work and study the slides
  • in class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

and limited grade range limit confidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

chem1102 reviews
Chem1201 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

3

B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values