AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Rachel Johnson

CDV6263 · CDV03 · VO2 · CDV40 · CDV62 · CDV04 · CDV63 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you need the specific CD course and can handle a ; expect mixed organization and support.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing chairLab-heavy CD coursesMandatory attendanceCaring for someAccessibility concerns
  • and unorganized or unhelpful experiences.
  • Courses often include lab hours, group work, papers, and .
  • Support and accessibility outside class are frequent pain points, including for students needing extra help.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Several students still earn A or A+ but , and uneven support rather than free grades.

Almost all grade-and-effort evidence is in person; the one .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Content is learnable with attendance and lab time, but , and schedule load raise the challenge.

In-person CDV04 and ; online sample is too thin for content claims.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Most reviews mark attendance mandatory with and lab co-enrollment expectations.

In person is consistently mandatory; the .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

About half the while recent reviews and support complaints pull the vibe down.

In-person opinions are split; the lone online review is a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some call her reasonable and success-oriented; .

Format shift

Tough-grader and ; online lacks grading detail beyond poor help.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

, and papers appear often across CD courses.

Format shift

Workload complaints .

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

Praise for passion, humor, and caring clashes with complaints about disorganization, sidetracking, and being unavailable.

Format shift

In-person reviews drive the split; online is one very negative help story.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

38/100

Group presentations, lab work, papers, and .

Format shift

and projects define assessment; online evidence is sparse.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person CD classes are lecture-plus-lab heavy with group work; some call her caring and .

Main concern

Organization, peer-talk-heavy lectures, and weak one-on-one help for struggling or special-needs students.

What students said

“Rachel is one of the . She cares about you, and she wants you to succeed.”
CDV04
“Idk and it felt like she was just there to assign work and that's it.”
CDV04
“I am special needs and I ask for help and she does not help she is to busy on her computer.”
CDV40

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is strongly negative about help, connection, and delayed useless responses.

Main concern

Student reported no real Zoom help and delayed messaging after requesting support.

What students said

“I reached out asking for help, she sent me a link and we never got on Zoom. She than had the nerve to message me two months later and still no help was given.”
CDV62

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; assessment centers on lab, projects, and papers more than high-stakes exams.

Group presentationLab hoursPapers and homework

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and coursework rather than a clearly described exam policy.

Group presentationLab co-enrollmentPapers
“ and presentation. Learned a lot from the lab.”
CDV04
“Be prepared to do ALOT of work and set time for the lab portion which is about 1 1/2 hours at the preschool.”
CDV04

Online

Reviews do .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Rachel is the . I had her for both 62 and 63 . She assigns a reasonable amount of homework and wants everyone to succeed and learn in her class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 mostly in-person Child Development reviews with one online case. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️ Polarized Experience

45/100

“Very eccentric & spontaneous... ... Disappointed.”

❤️ When It Clicks

80/100

“She cares about you, and she wants you to succeed. and easy to talk to.”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“Be prepared to do ALOT of work and set time for the lab portion”

🚫 Support Gaps

25/100

“I am special needs and I ask for help and she does not help she is to busy on her computer.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She made learning about human development fun and interesting
  • Gets sidetracked a lot during lectures
  • hands on teacher who is very passionate

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This class will keep you busy but is not that difficult if you attend lecture regularly
  • She isnt the easiest teacher but she really wants you to work
  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK, SO MANY PAPERS

Theme 3

🧭 About Access & Help

  • she never had office hours that you could talk one on one
  • She's busy but

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

14 reviews over many years are detailed but polarized and thin online, so confidence is medium rather than high.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

CDV046 reviews
CDV033 reviews
CDV401 review
CDV621 review
CDV62631 review
Show 2 more courses
CDV631 review
VO21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 4

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1