AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Enrique Jimenez

ENGRV02 · PHSCV01 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
44.44%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Avoid unless required; only take if and and harsh feedback.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarized reviewsSlow gradingTough graderArrogant feedback styleGroup projects and tests
  • some pass and professor and drop
  • and
  • Self-directed students may get through Solidworks or physical science, but support is unreliable

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

Some As exist with projects and , but tough grading, drops, and .

All evidence is in-person.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Difficulty averages about 3.2 with mixed claims from watch-and-follow design work to hard-to-keep-up physical science.

and PHSC courses.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

and warn that missed labs cannot be made up.

; a couple of design reviews list attendance as not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Take-again near 44 percent with and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Tough grader tags, harsh point deductions, and .

Format shift

and praise are from in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Homework, labs, group projects, and level.

Format shift

All workload evidence is in-person.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Average quality 2.8 with strong negatives on help style and arrogance against a minority of positive reviews.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is in-person and highly polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

64/100

Multiple exams, test-heavy tags, labs, and projects; test reviews help some students.

Format shift

All assessment evidence is in-person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are sharply split between passable design projects and scathing reports of , and .

Main concern

Unhelpful or arrogant responses, very slow grading, and .

What students said

“this is probably the .”
ENGRV02
“ .”
ENGRV02
“great class, but he takes a while to grade the labs.”
PHSCV01

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and labs matter; reviews mention test reviews and no surprises but .

Multiple examsTest reviewsLabs cannot be made upTest heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and hard-to-make-up labs, without clear webcam or Lockdown Browser claims.

Three examsTest reviewsTest correctionsLabs not make-upable
“ but if you go to lecture and review you'll be good, he doesn't throw surprises”
PHSCV01
“ as they cant be made up.”
PHSCV01

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Honestly, one of the worst professors I've had. Super arrogant in class and when helping a student with a concept. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 in-person , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Teaching Quality Split

34/100

“Does not help the students in the class, and acts very cocky if you do not know the answer.”

🐢

30/100

“takes about 150 years to grade the labs and another 150 years to respond to emails”

📉

28/100

“ .”

👍 Minority Positive Path

55/100

“if you show up to the ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • watch and follow most of the time
  • he'll just turn it around and question you back instead of giving a real answer

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Marked 5% down for having pictures in the wrong order
  • This was not that hard

Theme 3

⚠️ About Support and Tone

  • acts very cocky
  • He also teaches physics+eng(stressedout)

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Nine recent reviews are detailed but polarized, so but less stable than a larger consistent sample.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

PHSCV015 reviews
ENGRV024 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 2