AI Rate Professor

Economics

Ara Khanjian

ECON1 · ECONVO1B · MACROECONOMICS · ECON1A · MACROECON · ECONV01A · ECONB · ECONV01B · ECON · ECONV01 · ECONVO1A · ECON2 · ECON1B · 175 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
76.32%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you can, study hard for the three exams, and expect a fair but .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTest heavyCaringGraded by few thingsLecture heavyFree textbook
  • Grade is driven by three high-stakes exams (often ~90% of the grade).
  • In person he is clearer, funnier, and ; and quizzes.
  • Many report free OpenStax textbook plus a small Knewton Alta fee; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many earn As and sometimes getting a grade rounded up, but exams are ~90% of the grade so .

Online reviews split between easy-A with rounding and harsh no-round policies; in .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Intro econ content is manageable if you read and follow lectures; and short online terms, not advanced theory.

In person feels simpler with live lectures; online short terms .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

78/100

Most students report ; online is asynchronous with deadlines instead of seat time.

Online is largely asynchronous; in but many .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and clear criteria, tempered by test-heavy grading complaints.

In person recommendations are warmer; online reviews are more mixed on short terms and self-teaching.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Often rounds borderline grades and , but some report no rounding and .

Format shift

Rounding and generosity more common in person; online rounding is inconsistent across terms.

Workload

Light

72/100

Usually little homework outside reading and a few discussions; .

Format shift

Online adds daily or weekly quizzes and discussions; in .

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

and accessibility, though online often lacks recorded lectures and .

Format shift

In person teaching praised as funny and clear; online quality dips without taped lectures.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Three exams commonly make up about 75-90% of the grade with quizzes and discussions as small percentages.

Format shift

; online layers more chapter quizzes on top.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person classes are lecture-focused with little or no homework, study guides and practice tests that match exams, and if you show up and .

Main concern

Still almost entirely exam-based, so .

What students said

“Very simple class, show up and listen is basically all you have to do. Only assignments are 3 exams.”
ECON1A
“ . I remember getting a 70% on the and I got an A.”
ECON1A
“Your entire grade is based on two midterms and , so if you are not a .”
ECONVO1B

Remote format

Online

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections are heavily self-taught with , and ; some love the flexibility and occasional grade rounding, others hate short-term intensity and lack of lectures.

Main concern

; short summer terms and inconsistent rounding frustrate students.

What students said

“It was one of the harder WEB courses because , so study diligently for exams if you want an A.”
ECONV01A
“I emailed him asking to round my grade up to an 90% and he did. Great class and great professor!”
ECONV01A
“ to pass and does not round up your grade even if its a 89.9”
ECON2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and track textbook or lecture content; friendliness varies with study guides and occasional rounding rather than open-book policy.

Three high-stakes examsMultiple choiceStudy guides and practice testsReading-based questionsNo extra credit often

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and practice tests that mirror the ; grading is often described as generous.

Multiple choiceStudy guidesPractice tests match examsGenerous grading
“The . He is more interested in you learning the information rather than tricking you.”
ECONV01A
“Provides a and gives online practice tests that reflect the exact same questions on the exams.”
ECONV01A

Online

Online exams are high-weight, reading-based, and sometimes paired with daily quizzes; .

Exam heavyChapter quizzesReading-basedOccasional grade rounding
“The vast majority of your grade is made up of 3 exams, so if you get maybe below an 84% on any of them, an A is out of the picture.”
ECONV01B
“1st exam 30% 2nd exam 30% 3rd and final 30%”
ECONV01B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very simple class, show up and listen is basically all you have to do. Only assignments are 3 exams.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (27 online, 23 in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

📝

88/100

“The assignments are very easy but collectively, the 90% of your grade.”

❤️

76/100

“your grade is mostly based on test but succeed.”

📚 Free Textbook Tradeoff

70/100

“utilized a FREE textbook which was very concise.”

⚠️ Rounding Not Guaranteed

45/100

“I had a 89.5 and he would NOT round my grade up to a 90.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Super chill class. but nothing on the and he covers all topics in his lectures.
  • Ara is a great guy and seems to care about his students.
  • He's as funny and outgoing guy.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you lock in it is very possible to get an a!!
  • No offered so if you're a
  • and study material and you will pass.

Theme 3

💻 Online vs In Person

  • This is a professor that should only be taken in person.
  • , so easy to get an A (I missed some deadlines so I didn't).
  • no taped lectures, just a and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

175

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews spanning years with , and format differences support a high-confidence read.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 584
4 out of 543
3 out of 513
2 out of 520
1 out of 516

Course coverage

ECONV01A17 reviews
ECONV01B11 reviews
ECON1B5 reviews
ECON1A3 reviews
ECON23 reviews
Show 8 more courses
ECONVO1B3 reviews
ECONVO1A2 reviews
ECON1 review
ECON11 review
ECONB1 review
ECONV011 review
MACROECON1 review
MACROECONOMICS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

49 reported outcomes

A range

29

A+ 2 · A 25 · A- 2

B range

12

B+ 5 · B 7

C range

5

C 3 · C- 2

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1