AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kristine Ryan

MATHVO1 · MATHV10 · MATHV05 · MATHV46 · MATHV03 · GEOMETRY · MATHV01 · VO4 · MATHV12 · MATHV04 · MATHV44 · MATHV40 · V03 · MATHV38 · MATHV02 · 40 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
55.17%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you will stay on top of quizzes and practice work; skip if you need a slow, flexible, or soft-graded math class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTest HeavyPolarizing Math TeacherQuiz IntensiveUncollected HomeworkClear When You Engage
  • and , and unhelpful.
  • and exams; and not collected.
  • An A is realistic if you attend, do the practice, and use her study sessions, but leniency is not guaranteed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

Many students earn As and using drops or study sessions, but others report strict grading and .

Most ; online comments only say study for tests.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is standard college math that becomes hard when lectures move fast and quizzes follow immediately.

; online notes are thinner.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

, and several say skipping lectures or Zooms tanks your chance to pass.

and you will not pass; online notes are limited.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

because she is caring and clear, while the other half warn to choose another math professor.

Recommendation is mixed in both formats, with stronger praise and criticism in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some call her lenient with drops and , while , and grade errors.

Format shift

Leniency praise and .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students repeatedly report frequent homework, weekly quizzes, long notes, and .

Format shift

Heavy work comments appear in both formats, with more detail in person.

Teaching experience

Average

64/100

Strong core of students say and cares, but a large minority find lectures rushed, boring, or unsupportive.

Format shift

Teaching quality swings more sharply in person than in the few online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Grades are driven by quizzes and exams, with .

Format shift

Exam and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and care; critics cite rushed lectures, strict grading, and disability/scheduling inflexibility.

Main concern

Test-heavy structure and .

What students said

“She explained what we were learning in simple terminology and she is a .”
MATHV44
“4 long homeworks every wk. . Teaches too fast.”
MATHV44
“Almost a , so you never are able to really learn the material and study for it.”
MATHV02

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and success depends on watching material and studying tests.

Main concern

Little online evidence and .

What students said

“Professor was . Just study for the test”
MATHV38
“What's on the so do it!”
MATHV38
“Boring class doesn't pay attention to students.”
V03

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Expect and equation-style exams; some students get formula sheets or drops, but .

Frequent QuizzesTest HeavyFill-In ExamsDrop Lowest ScoresNo Notes Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person, quizzes are frequent and , though some classes allow formula sheets or dropped scores.

Weekly QuizzesFill-In ExamsFormula Cheat SheetsDrop One Exam
“You are literally provided cheat sheets with formulas you js have to know how to use them.”
32715
“Always a difficult fill the whole equation in .”
MATHV44
“Almost a ”
MATHV02

Online

Online comments only stress studying for tests and .

Study for TestsHomework Mirrors Tests
“Just study for the test”
MATHV38
“What's on the so do it!”
MATHV38

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I wouldn't show up to class a good majority of the time but because she .”

Voice snapshots generated from 40 reviews spanning 2012-2025, highlighting the polarizing teaching and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

64/100

“Professor Ryan was one of the .”

📝

78/100

“Almost a , so you never are able to really learn the material and study for it.”

⚖️

48/100

“Grades super strictly. ZERO scheduling flexibility no matter circumstances.”

👍 Recommendation Split

52/100

“ if you can.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She explained what we were learning in simple terminology
  • She rushes the lecture each and every time
  • Notes are long and so is lectures but her teaching style is easy to understand

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • It is easy to succeed in the class
  • and two quizzes

Theme 3

❤️ About Care and Access

  • She cares about everyone's success with class
  • She didn't care to help
  • She is willing to help and quiz days

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

40

Recent reviews read by the AI

40

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

40 reviews spanning many years with , and a love-hate split make the pattern reliable.

Inside 40 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 522
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 57
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATHV448 reviews
MATHV026 reviews
MATHV385 reviews
MATHV043 reviews
V033 reviews
Show 11 more courses
327152 reviews
GEOMETRY2 reviews
MATHV012 reviews
MATHV402 reviews
MATHV031 review
MATHV051 review
MATHV101 review
MATHV121 review
MATHV461 review
MATHVO11 review
VO41 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

32 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 3 · A 9 · A- 4

B range

7

B+ 3 · B 4

C range

5

C+ 1 · C 4

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2