AI Rate Professor

Ethnic Studies

Antonio De La Garza

Courses not reported · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid unless you are ready to teach yourself the material and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPassionate but unclearHeavy research loadLate gradingConfusing promptsSelf-directed work
  • Students respect his passion but say lectures and .
  • , and creative tasks with vague rubrics.
  • Grades can still land at A or B, yet .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

Several students still earned As, but only after heavy research and .

Both online and ; no format is clearly easier.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Content load is high and poorly scaffolded, with lots of reading, papers, and independent research.

Online emphasizes research time; in-person emphasizes lengthy lectures and creative projects.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

and not in others, with little clarity on enforcement value.

Online and and one non-mandatory report.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

and repeated complaints about teaching, workload, and organization.

Negative consensus holds across both online and in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

He may accept late work, but and and opaque.

Format shift

; online notes stress missing guidance and .

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Students report too many papers, research tasks, essays, skits, and .

Format shift

Both formats mention heavy independent work and many papers.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Passion does not translate into useful lectures, timely support, or .

Format shift

Online students say outside resources teach better; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grades revolve around papers, research, discussions, and .

Format shift

Neither format clearly documents a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person he is still passionate, but lengthy lectures and .

Main concern

and , and other high-effort work.

What students said

“Lengthy lectures and .”
31377
“The and unorganized.”
31377

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections feel under-supported, with weak lecture videos and heavy independent research.

Main concern

Not and grading responses.

What students said

“resources from outside his lectures taught better then he did.”
31377
“This professor didn't provide and assignments.”
31377

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a ; assessment risk comes .

Paper-heavy assessmentResearch-heavy homeworkUnclear rubrics

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence highlights essays, art, skits, and .

Essays and creative projectsUnclear prompts
“He and more, not relevant to the class at all.”
31377

Online

Online evidence focuses on research-heavy .

Research-heavy online workSlow grading
“Most of the work was online and had to do a lot of research was very time consuming”
31377

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This professor didn't provide and assignments.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 consistently critical Ethnic Studies reviews, focusing on support gaps and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“resources from outside his lectures taught better then he did.”

📚 Workload Overload

22/100

“it was too much for a 14 week class.”

📉 Organization Problems

20/100

“The and unorganized.”

⏱️ Support Lag

18/100

“He didn't grade on time nor answer emails on time.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • very passionate professor
  • lectures and
  • resources from outside his lectures taught better then he did

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He accepts late work despite what the syllabus says

Theme 3

📝 About Assignments

  • So many papers
  • The criteria and
  • didn't provide

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only four detailed and consistent negative reviews support a , but the small sample limits high confidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

313774 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values