AI Rate Professor

Science

Stephanie Mutz

BIOLV10 · ESRM01 · ESRMV01 · 28 lifetime ratings

AI rating
29/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
34.48%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid unless you are highly self-directed, can tolerate long videos, and will never miss a deadline.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderLecture HeavySlow GradingAI AccusationsFishing Over Teaching
  • Many students report long, slow lecture videos and low engagement.
  • , and no-late-work policies create high stress.
  • A minority of students who stay organized and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

You can earn an A if you complete every discussion and , but , and zero late work make the path high-effort.

Online reviews more often mention doable As with steady work; and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Content is not advanced science, but long rambling videos, hidden prompts, and intellectual load.

Both formats complain about lecture quality; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

and participation matters, with weekly discussions that require watching lectures.

Online still requires weekly participation via discussions; as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

and most recent reviews urge students to find another professor.

A few older online reviews are warmer; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and slow unexplained low scores.

Format shift

In-person reviews more often cite AI accusations; online reviews cite no late work and .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Weekly discussions, long multi-hour video loads, readings, and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize video length and ; and hard finals.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Students , and secondary to her fishing career.

Format shift

Online and in-person both criticize engagement; older online reviews are slightly kinder.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

38/100

, and videos more than a single high-stakes exam set.

Format shift

Online centers discussions and EC; and difficult finals too.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews focus on , and a sense she prioritizes fishing over students.

Main concern

False AI flags, unprofessional communication, and .

What students said

“she falsely accused me of using AI and took .”
ESRMV01
“I was accused of using AI on original work and received a zero despite writing it myself.”
ESRMV01
“Lectures were long and confusing and hard to get through and the .”
ESRMV01

Remote format

Online

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections are homework- and , and little instructor help.

Main concern

, and zero flexibility on late work.

What students said

“Long lectures videos, she talks SO SLOW, a lot of .”
ESRMV01
“Instead of directly tasking the students, you need to listen to her talk about a bunch of random stuff for 40 minutes first.”
BIOLV10
“She cares more about fishing than her teaching. Doesn't help us visual learners at all.”
ESRMV01

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; others report very hard finals versus lectures.

Paragraph exam responsesQuestions released earlyWeekly discussionsHarder finals than lectures

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews say finals felt much harder than lectures and .

Difficult finalsMismatch with lecturesQuizzes
“the we learned in the lectures.”
ESRMV01
“ , and some quizzes.”
ESRMV01

Online

Online students describe exams as paragraph responses to questions given early, plus weekly discussions.

Exam questions given beforeParagraph responsesWeekly discussionsExtra credit
“ paragraphs to each question & turn in.”
ESRMV01
“Have .”
ESRMV01

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This professor is unwilling to help out a student in need. and uncooperative.”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Quality

28/100

“Class is not very interesting, lectures are not as engaging, making it very boring.”

🚫 Recommendation

30/100

“ .”

⚖️

28/100

“she falsely accused me of using AI and took .”

📚 Workload Load

28/100

“Long lectures videos, she talks SO SLOW, a lot of .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Get ready for long lectures [over an hour] with the filler words
  • She cares more about fishing than her teaching.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you're looking for an easy A.
  • but follow her instructions to a tea
  • .

Theme 3

💬 About Support & Tone

  • When I sent her an
  • Doesnt accept late work even if its 1 minute late.
  • She's tough but fair. .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

28

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

29 detailed reviews spanning 2018-2026 with , and workload.

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 54
3 out of 54
2 out of 54
1 out of 515

Course coverage

ESRMV0116 reviews
BIOLV1011 reviews
ESRM012 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

26 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 2 · A 9

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 2 · C- 1

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 3