AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Deanna Hall

CDV01 · V04 · V66 · CDV64A · CDV64B · CDV24 · V61 · CDV61 · CDV63 · CDV02 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
35%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you need the specific , and have no other instructor option.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderPolarizingLots of PapersUnclear InstructionsPop Quizzes
  • Reviews are sharply split between devoted fans and students who warn others to run.
  • Recent V04 sections report harsh grading, fast talking, and many failing students.
  • Older Child Development , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

, and sudden assignment changes make an A a real grind rather than a default.

Online reviews stress hard no-notes quizzes; and harsh scales.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

, and fast lectures raise difficulty beyond a standard intro CD class.

Both formats call content demanding; recent in-person V04 is especially harsh.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and participation affects the grade.

and skip-and-fail risk.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

and many recent students explicitly warn others not to enroll.

A minority of ; recent online and in-person V04 reviews are strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

, and unpredictable scales appear across many reviews.

Format shift

Online and in-person both report harsh grading; .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Many papers, readings, presentations, quizzes, and sometimes volunteering hours.

Format shift

In-person more often cites papers and presentations; .

Teaching experience

Average

40/100

some call her passionate and , and unhelpful.

Format shift

; recent V04 is sharply negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

62/100

, and presentations drive grades more than pure participation.

Format shift

Online emphasizes hard quizzes; , and presentations.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person experiences range from inspirational mentoring to crash-out classroom dynamics and unfair zeros.

Main concern

, and high stress in core CD courses.

What students said

“ . She made lots of students in my class want to change majors.”
V04
“ if you can! Shes the worse professor I had ever encounter.”
CDV63
“Deanna is amazing ! is straight forward”
V66

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and one positive breakdown of work.

Main concern

Hidden syllabus items, hard quizzes without notes, and .

What students said

“A teacher more concerned with criticizing and lecturing than wanting her students to learn and succeed.”
V04
“ ! No notes were allowed for quizzes.”
V61
“My and breaks it down so you don't lose focus and it is a fun class.”
V04

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are often closed-notes and difficult, with pop quizzes and heavy paper scrutiny.

Hard testsNo notes on quizzesPop quizzesFill-in-blank and essay testsPapers graded harshly

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person tests are often no-book no-notes fill-in-blank and .

No book no notesFill-in-blank and essayPop quizzesHarsh paper grading
“ , and in class. (Usually) Just so you know!”
V61
“She tore all my papers with a grade 0.”
CDV63

Online

Online students report hard quizzes with no notes allowed and .

No notes on quizzesHard testsHidden syllabus items
“ ! No notes were allowed for quizzes.”
V61
“ .”
V61

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . ... Every student in this class is failing too. You've been warned!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Quality

40/100

“her teaching style is lacking! ”

🚫 Recommendation

34/100

“ if you can! Shes the worse professor I had ever encounter.”

⚖️

22/100

“Grades things horribly and talks too fast in class for you to understand”

📚 Workload

30/100

“Lot of work and presentations.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and .
  • She is fun to listen to and makes me inspired to teach!
  • talks too fast in class for you to understand what she's trying to teach.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and .
  • be prepared to work for your grade not an easy A
  • They are often less centered around actually learning the concepts, and more word play meant to trick you

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Deanna is great! , and she cares about her students!
  • Her lack of empathy is hard to deal with.
  • crash out demon ..

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

23 reviews over many years with rich detail; opinions conflict but and .

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 52
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 57

Course coverage

V048 reviews
CDV613 reviews
CDV022 reviews
CDV242 reviews
CDV632 reviews
Show 5 more courses
V612 reviews
CDV011 review
CDV64A1 review
CDV64B1 review
V661 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

22 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 4 · A- 2

B range

4

B 4

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

3

D 3

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Not sure yet 5