AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Ronald Mules

PHIL01 · PHILV01 · PHIL1 · PHILV02 · PHILVO1 · PHILOSOPHYV01 · 57 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
78.95%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

and clear tests; online is more hit-or-miss so check current format carefully.

Best fit · Effort For RewardAmazing lecturesStudy-guide friendlyAttendance mattersPhilosophy made funExam-focused GE
  • In-person students overwhelmingly love animated lectures, humor, and study guides that map to tests.
  • , and study the guides and many call it an easy or fair A .
  • some find module exams easy, others .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many students report easy As from notes, study guides, and , though some online critics struggle for higher than a C.

; online ranges from module word-for-word .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Material can be dense but lectures and .

; online difficulty depends on self-pacing and reading load.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

In person, attendance counts and missing ; .

In-person attendance is clearly enforced; online .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Large majority rave about lectures and as the main caveat.

; online reviews are mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

, and dropped lowest scores; a minority online report generic low Cs.

Format shift

and supportive; some online students report bot-like or tough scores.

Workload

Light

70/100

, and several exams rather than constant busywork.

Format shift

Online has more discussions and quizzes; and .

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Consistently praised as , and passionate, especially in live lectures.

Format shift

In-person teaching is elite; online quality is lower when content relies on third-party videos.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

with study guides and some short writings.

Format shift

; online adds discussions and module quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

42 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person philosophy is highly rated for riveting lectures, humor, study guides, and if you attend and .

Main concern

Attendance and memorization matter; skipping lectures hurts because .

What students said

“Professor Mules is one of the .”
PHILV01
“EASY A, if you dedicate a few minutes to reviewing notes.”
PHILV01
“Just attend class everyday and and you should easily pass.”
PHILV01

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online PHIL is quiz and exam heavy with some easy module-based As and some frustration .

Main concern

and occasional harsh timed exams or .

What students said

“The , word for word just look.”
PHIL01
“Impossible to get more than a C.”
PHILV01
“he only gave us 60 mins to answer a 50 question test that was maybe 75% fill in the blanks.”
PHILV01

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

guides; friendliness is high in person and more variable online.

Study guidesFill-in and short answerDropped lowest examTimed online tests

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

real exam, with short answers, fill-ins, and memorization from lecture notes.

Study guidesLecture-based testsShort answerExtra credit
“ ”
PHILV01
“His study guides are basically the tests and he gives you weeks to study.”
PHILV01

Online

Online exams include module quizzes and timed multi-question tests; answers sometimes map directly to modules, but some report harsh timers.

Module quizzesTimed testsDrop lowestDiscussion posts
“Professor gives out 4 exams + 1 final (100pt each) You don't have to take the final, he drops your lowest grade 4/5.”
PHIL01
“he only gave us 60 mins to answer a 50 question test that was maybe 75% fill in the blanks.”
PHILV01

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Mules is one of the . He makes his lectures so interesting and throws some relevant stories that he makes fun and catch your attention.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (8 online, 42 in-person), highlighting lectures, exams, and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“LOVED his lectures, never missed a class because I always wanted to go.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

86/100

“would 100% recommend and !”

📗 Easy With Notes

78/100

“EASY A, if you dedicate a few minutes to reviewing notes. No book, justtake notes”

💻 Online Caveat

40/100

“At least when it comes to being held in an online class, he is a bad teacher”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is like a storyteller during his lectures.
  • His lectures are so good at times, that
  • passionate about teaching and is very easy

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Just attend class everyday and and you should easily pass.
  • You really have to work for your grade in this class.
  • The , word for word

Theme 3

📝

  • He gives you a study guide for each one.
  • Study sheets he passes out are A+.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

57

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over many years with and enough online detail to compare formats.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 543
4 out of 511
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PHILV0133 reviews
PHILV025 reviews
PHILVO15 reviews
PHIL014 reviews
PHILOSOPHYV012 reviews
Show 1 more courses
PHIL11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

24 reported outcomes

A range

17

A+ 7 · A 10

B range

2

B+ 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 1