AI Rate Professor

English

Sheryl Leonard

ENGV01B · ENGV03 · ENGLIV02 · ENGLV02 · V01B · ENGLISHV01B · ENGLV01A · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you want a caring writing coach and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring MentorLots of HomeworkDelayed GradingStrong FeedbackHeavy Reading
  • Students praise her care and .
  • Workload is heavy with peer reviews and frequent ungraded backlog.
  • and attainable As if you complete analysis work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

As are attainable with , but you must earn them through volume and quality, not .

Online reviews stress earning grades through heavy peer work; in-person reviews echo effort-based As with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is standard college English with , and analysis rather than pure busywork.

Both formats report substantial reading and writing; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

and sometimes optional depending on term and section.

Online often marks attendance not mandatory; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Most students recommend her for care and and .

Recommendation is warmer in older in-person reviews; recent online reviews are more mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and sometimes lenient, but delayed returns and volume-based scoring frustrate students.

Format shift

Online comments highlight .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Frequent essays, peer reviews, and .

Format shift

Online .

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

, and useful feedback with occasional personal-life or grading-lag setbacks.

Format shift

and lectures; online focuses on availability and feedback.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Grades , and participation rather than big exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignment-heavy assessment.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and inspirational with good lectures, but and sometimes ungraded piles.

Main concern

Lots of work that may sit .

What students said

“so to you very fast”
ENGV01B
“She wants students to succeed given them many opportunities to bump up their grade”
ENGLISHV01B
“She's really the best! ”
ENGLV01A

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and analysis; and volume frustrate some while others earn solid As.

Main concern

High assignment volume and .

What students said

“you are not graded based on the quality of work you submit but the number of assignments”
ENGV01B
“ as you go along so you don't know where you stand in the class”
ENGLISHV01B
“You have to earn it in this class, but the and attainable”
ENGLISHV01B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews rarely detail formal exams and instead stress continuous writing and analysis assignments.

Analysis-focused writingPeer review heavyLimited exam detail

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and projects over clearly described exams.

Research projectsParticipationHomework heavy
“There is a lot of work and them makes up most of ”
ENGLV01A
“There is a lot of work, which can be overwhelming or confusing but !”
V01B

Online

Online comments focus on assignment volume and .

Peer reviewsDelayed gradingNo textbook required
“The class is mainly peer reviews and ”
ENGV01B
“Besides the your peers, which is time-consuming”
ENGLISHV01B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Leonard was so sweet. . She really wants to help her students improve their writing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews spanning online and , and grading lag. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“Sheryl does an amazing job and really goes out of her way to help students learn because she cares.”

📚 Heavy Workload

32/100

“Simply, no. This class is a waste of time, you are not graded based on the quality of work you submit but the number of assignments.”

⏳

45/100

“so ... it sucks thinking you are doing good until you get graded and ”

👍

68/100

“ ”

Theme 1

❤️ About Character

  • and kind
  • She's funny, cute and talks about important issues
  • One of ! she was so helpful

Theme 2

📝 About Workload and Grades

  • Be ready to read and write a lot
  • You have to earn it in this class, but the and attainable
  • You have to work for your grade, you're in college get used to it

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are awesome, not boring
  • Gives thorough lectures which makes the material easier understand

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty reviews spanning 2012-2025 with consistent themes on care, workload, and .

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 53
3 out of 54
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGLV01A6 reviews
ENGLISHV01B5 reviews
ENGV01B4 reviews
ENGV032 reviews
ENGLIV021 review
Show 2 more courses
ENGLV021 review
V01B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 3 · A 3

B range

3

B 3

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Pass 1