AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Andrea Reynolds

PHILVO2 · PHILO101 · PHILV01 · PHIL1 · PHILO15 · PHILV04 · PHILV02 · ETHIC2 · PHIV01 · PHI15 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you want a rigorous philosophy or logic challenge and will attend, practice, and follow instructions precisely.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderPassionate About PhilosophyHeavy Logic WorkloadExpects High EffortMixed Clarity
  • Logic and philosophy content is dense and often compared to hard STEM; As require serious work.
  • She is repeatedly called a and feedback.
  • Passion and helpfulness appear when students ask questions, but older reviews attack unprepared or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Even students who earned As , and dense logic or reading demands.

Both formats report hard work for grades; sample of online evidence is only two reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Material is dense, fast in summer, and repeatedly labeled much harder than expected for intro philosophy or logic.

Online and ; older in-person reviews are especially negative on clarity.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

Attendance and on-time homework matter frequently, with .

; one online review also lists attendance yes.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

and growth; many others warn about GPA risk and weak teaching.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

and no-curve stories dominate; but standards are exacting.

Format shift

Online and in-person both note tough grading; .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of , and constant practice for logic.

Format shift

Online emphasizes quizzes and discussion posts; in-person logic stresses heavy practice.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Passionate and helpful for engaged students, but many report confusion, rambling, or and materials.

Format shift

Recent in-person and online lean more positive on passion; .

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Mix of quizzes, papers, homework practice, and scores.

Format shift

Online leans quizzes and posts; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

complaints about difficulty, unprepared lectures, and GPA risk in intro courses.

Main concern

High difficulty and intro.

What students said

“Really great prof! very passionate about philosophy and .”
PHIL1
“I got an A, but I worked very, very, very hard for it. Logic is compared to calculus and O-Chem so you have been warned!”
PHILV04
“ if your GPA is important to you.”
PHILV01

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Recent online logic is difficult with many quizzes, discussions, and papers; kindness and .

Main concern

Unpredictable due dates and heavy writing or quiz load.

What students said

“This course was very difficult but and I could tell she was very passionate about logic and philosophy!”
PHILV04
“ , and not predictable, and although it is an online course she has assignments due certain days of the week.”
PHILV04

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are frequently hard and unforgiving, though study guides and .

Difficult TestsStudy GuidesNo Curve ReportedWriting Can Offset Exams

Assessment risk

Strict

38/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

class scores and ; asking questions and using writing help recovery.

Difficult TestsNo CurveStudy GuidesWriting Offsets Exams
“Out of 40, 21 got 0-40% on a test. so it messed everyone up.”
PHILV04
“I found the tests difficult but I was able to make up for my low grades with the writing assignments.”
PHILO15

Online

Online reviews stress heavy quizzes and coursework difficulty but .

Many QuizzesDifficult Coursework
“There is a lot of quizzes and discussion posts, and if you struggle with wording maybe rethink this course.”
PHILV04

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I got an A, but I worked very, very, very hard for it. Logic is compared to calculus and O-Chem so you have been warned!”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews (2 online, 19 in person), weighing recent rigor against older teaching complaints. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“very passionate about philosophy and .”

⚖️

30/100

“ , but .”

🧠 Course Difficulty

28/100

“Hard material! This class takes a lot of self-discipline. if you are a slacker.”

👍 Recommendation

48/100

“ if your GPA is important to you.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • very passionate about philosophy
  • engaging, funny and there for you if you need help
  • rambles in class about nothing at all, and is always unprepared

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Extremely difficult class
  • Easy A if you put forth the effort
  • WAY more difficult than it should have been

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • Lots of homework
  • So many papers
  • tons of

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

21 reviews with only 2 online and many older sparse comments; tone is mixed across eras so confidence is moderate.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 56
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

PHILV015 reviews
PHIL14 reviews
PHILV044 reviews
PHILVO22 reviews
ETHIC21 review
Show 5 more courses
PHI151 review
PHILO1011 review
PHILO151 review
PHILV021 review
PHIV011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 2 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values