AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Peter Kallik

V03 · BUSVO3 · CRN70112 · BUSV03 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
72.73%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want a caring accounting teacher and will keep up with .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful AccountingClear LecturesAttendance ExpectedHomework HeavyMixed Online Quality
  • Most students find him knowledgeable, patient, and good at simplifying accounting.
  • Homework and and .
  • Online quality is mixed with and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Grades range from A+ to C+ and Withdrawal; but exams and and are not free As.

In-person outcomes look friendlier; online includes tougher grades and a drop.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Accounting concepts need practice; and .

Difficulty tags cluster around moderate to hard in both formats.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and emphasize participation and being present in class.

Both online and ; only one online says no.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and call him helpful and funny, tempered by unfair or unprepared online complaints.

In-person recommendations are stronger; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Some tough-grader tags and , and support when students struggle.

Format shift

Online has more unfair or ; and fair.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Regular homework, reading, and a light.

Format shift

Online homework volume is a frequent complaint; and long projects.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Strong praise for knowledge, humor, patience, and simplifying job-relevant accounting outweigh sparse negative online experiences.

Format shift

In-person teaching is consistently strong; online depends on the term.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Weekly homework plus exams and a focus.

Format shift

; and a long project.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews largely praise patience, presence, and and solid help after class.

Main concern

Tests and is supportive.

What students said

“ . He knows what he is talking about and is very knowledgeable about the subject.”
V03
“Peter, is very patience and makes you want to go to class. and stays after to answer any questions”
CRN70112
“The and the .”
BUSV03

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Some online students praise weekly videos and support, while others , and poor email response.

Main concern

Uneven online delivery and .

What students said

“Prof K posted weekly videos on tough topics and HW problems that were easy to follow.”
BUSV03
“online lectures are nothing more than a ten minute video that , and you are expected to do tons of youtube research”
BUSVO3
“the and homework.”
BUSV03

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

harder than homework, with little proctoring detail in comments.

Homework PracticeExams Differ from PracticeFinal ProjectStandard Accounting Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person tests can be hard and the or proctoring claims.

Hard TestsLong Final Project
“The and the .”
BUSV03
“ but mostly easy”
BUSV03

Online

Online comments and thin lecture prep rather than proctoring tools.

Exams Differ from HomeworkWeekly VideosOnline Homework
“I found that the and homework.”
BUSV03
“ minute one even if you don't understand.”
BUSVO3

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He put in effort so his students learned the content. His big focus was preparing everyone to move on to financial accounting and pass that class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 accounting reviews, balancing strong in-person teaching praise with mixed online delivery. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯

78/100

“He will help you succeed in his class and is willing to explain in detail how to use accounting principles.”

📚 Workload and

45/100

“the and homework.”

🖥️ Uneven Online Experience

40/100

“It's clear this teacher has never taught online before, online lectures are nothing more than a ten minute video that ”

👍

72/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching and Support

  • Mr. Peter K. is very considerate and gives .
  • He simplifies concepts and tells you what parts you will avctually use in an accounting job.
  • he was the most funny professor l know

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • but mostly easy
  • The and the .
  • Do not waste your time, unfair professor

Theme 3

🖥️ About Online Delivery

  • Prof K posted weekly videos on tough topics and HW problems that were easy to follow.
  • .
  • you are expected to do tons of youtube research to understand the rest.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Only 11 reviews with mixed online quality and limited exam-policy detail .

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

BUSV034 reviews
BUSVO33 reviews
CRN701122 reviews
V032 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 3 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1