AI Rate Professor

English

Vita Watkins

ENGVO1 · ENGLV01B · ENGLV01A · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid Vita Watkins unless you are fully self-sufficient and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderRude And UnresponsiveHeavy Paper LoadDo Not RecommendHarsh Essay Feedback
  • Nearly all .
  • Students report harsh zero scores, letter-grade docking for pencil use, and dropped enrollment without warning.
  • Only one older positive note on critical thinking; overall tone is hostile and unhelpful.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

One student earned an A only by being self-sufficient while and whole letter-grade penalties for minor issues.

; no online reviews exist.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

, and high difficulty ratings make the content feel hard even for capable writers.

; no online reviews exist.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as mandatory and one student was dropped after missing class for a family death.

; no online reviews exist.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Five of six reviews strongly discourage taking her, calling her rude, unfair, or the .

; no online reviews exist.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

, and letter-grade docks for writing in pencil dominate the feedback.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students cite lots of homework, many papers, and people by finals.

Format shift

Workload comments are all from in-person sections.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students describe her as , and not teaching useful material despite one older positive review.

Format shift

Teaching quality .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assessment centers on essays, papers, and .

Format shift

No clear online assessment evidence; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person English sections are described as hostile, with , and students dropping or switching majors.

Main concern

Harsh zeros on essays, unresponsive emails, and .

What students said

“ and any class she teaches enough.”
ENGLV01A
“ . .”
ENGLV01B
“I had a death in the family and had to miss a class and she dropped me. Without warning.”
ENGLV01A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize papers and essays more than formal exams, so and not student-friendly by default.

Essay HeavyPaper Based Assessment

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and papers rather than clearly described midterms or proctored finals.

Essay HeavyPaper Based Assessment
“when she graded me a 0 for .”
ENGLV01A
“She docked me a WHOLE LETTER GRADE because I wrote in pencil.”
ENGLV01B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews spanning 2009-2025, highlighting harsh grading and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫

12/100

“ and any class she teaches enough.”

📉

18/100

“when she graded me a 0 for .”

😤 Classroom Climate

18/100

“She's rude, mean, and ”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I got an A not because she was a great professor, but because I am self-sufficient.
  • when she graded me a 0 for .
  • She docked me a WHOLE LETTER GRADE because I wrote in pencil.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • this lady is the devil.
  • Stuck up, arrogant, rude, has no respect for students
  • She's rude, mean, and

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I learned absolutely nothing.
  • she makes no sense and .
  • I learned a lot about critical thinking and seeing the big picture.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews span 2009 to 2025 with consistent negative tone, but the sample is small and some comments are old or sparse on assessment details.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENGLV01A3 reviews
ENGVO12 reviews
ENGLV01B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1