AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Karen Wilde

V01 · MATHV10 · TRIG01 · MATHVO4 · MATHV05 · MATHV03 · MATHV01 · MATH1 · MATHV04 · ALGEBV01 · MATHV44 · MATH04 · MATHV40 · MATHTRIG · V03 · MATH10 · V10 · 68 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid unless you already learn math quickly and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderLots of homeworkLecture heavyGets annoyed by questionsSkip class you won't pass
  • Many students report , and her-method-only expectations
  • and fast pacing overwhelm students who need patient help
  • A minority of strong, disciplined math students still succeed and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

As require perfect note-taking, , and tough tests with little partial credit.

Nearly all evidence is in person; the one online review was easier.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

, and many say tutoring is required to survive.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

, and skipping is tied to failing.

; online sample is too small.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

and many urge others to switch professors to protect GPA and confidence.

Negative consensus is in person; one .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

, and mark-downs for alternate correct methods.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Students describe lots of homework on short timelines plus lecture-heavy classes and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

and fair if prepared; many say she is condescending, impatient, and hard to learn from.

Format shift

The sole online review is warm; in-person tone is often hostile.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tests and and sometimes re-dos.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are deeply split but lean negative: , and high drop rates.

Main concern

Feeling scolded for questions and graded unfairly if you use alternate correct methods.

What students said

“Asking questions in the class was a death sentence, as you would be scolded for not taking proper notes”
MATHVO4
“Doesnt . Gets annoyed very easily.”
MATHV03

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online pandemic Zoom review is positive, calling lectures easy and .

Main concern

Only one online review, so results may not generalize.

What students said

“She was really nice, helpful, and her lectures we're easy. but its doable”
MATHV01

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are strict and high-stakes, with limited partial credit and pressure to use her exact strategies.

Tough testsLittle partial creditHer method onlyPop quizzesFlash cards on some tests

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as hard, sometimes covering unseen methods, with little partial credit and .

No partial creditMethod-specific gradingPop quizzesTough exams
“About 90% of but it wasnt her exact strategies and I got a 42/100 on the test.”
MATHV03
“god forbid you use a different formula, as you'd get marked down with even the right answer”
MATHVO4

Online

The single online review .

Weekly homeworkQuestions answered in class
“She goes over any question that you have and even offers help outside class .”
MATHV01

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (49 in person, 1 online), emphasizing repeated grading and climate themes. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

34/100

“She's good at being condescending & demotivating students.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

25/100

“ if you arent a fast learner.”

⚖️

18/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Reality

22/100

“ ! Expects you to do it in 2 days even if you have other classes.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Welcome back to high school
  • She goes way too fast and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Doesnt
  • She teaches you one method but if you already know another method... she won't give you credit
  • All you have to do and she will pass you

Theme 3

💔 About Classroom Climate

  • Asking questions in the class was a death sentence
  • She told a guy he was giving her a head ache
  • Made me feel uncomfortable when I would ask a question

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

68

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over many years show a large, consistent negative cluster with a smaller positive minority of strong students.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 514
3 out of 55
2 out of 58
1 out of 525

Course coverage

MATHV0314 reviews
MATHV015 reviews
MATHV055 reviews
ALGEBV014 reviews
MATHV103 reviews
Show 13 more courses
MATH042 reviews
MATHV042 reviews
MATHV402 reviews
MATHVO42 reviews
V032 reviews
V102 reviews
343091 review
MATH11 review
MATH101 review
MATHTRIG1 review
MATHV441 review
TRIG011 review
V011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

25 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 1 · A 7

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

3

C 1 · C- 2

D range

1

D 1

F

3

F 3

No letter grade reported

8

Drop/Withdrawal 5 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1