AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Aurora Meadows

HEDR114 · HEDV87 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
36.36%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can self-manage a and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProSlow gradingUnorganized onlineParticipation mattersDetached communicationExtra credit
  • Many online students , and weak engagement.
  • Course content is not extremely hard, but organization and responsiveness drag the experience down.
  • Older reviews are more positive; recent ones lean negative on communication.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Many students still land B or A grades with , but poor structure and .

; in-person notes similar communication gaps.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is often called not too difficult, with limited tests, but reading and participation still matter.

Both formats describe moderate content difficulty with uneven delivery.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

as mandatory while others mark it optional.

Online reviews mix optional and mandatory Zoom/participation rules.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

and recent comments focus on detachment, hostility, and chaos more than learning value.

Online reviews drive most of the negative recommendation signal.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

helps, but and tough spots leave students unsure of standing.

Format shift

Online reviews especially complain about months-long ungraded work.

Workload

Light

62/100

Several students say few tests and .

Format shift

Online and .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Knowledgeable on nutrition topics, but engagement, organization, and responsiveness are frequently poor.

Format shift

Online reviews are harsher than the two in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of , and a couple of harder tests.

Format shift

Online comments mention discussions and few tests; and opinions.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but still criticize slow responses, ungraded work, and sometimes hostile discussion tone.

Main concern

Poor communication and .

What students said

“She never answered any concerns I had until after the .”
HEDR114
“Communication was lacking. Texts or e-mails went unanswered. .”
HEDV87

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections often feel detached, with modules set up poorly, late or missing grades, and uneven engagement despite some .

Main concern

and weak online organization frustrate students for months.

What students said

“Is not engaging with students in online courses. Sets up modules wrong so I was unable to get full credit for discussion assignments.”
HEDV87
“ and neither grades for months or answer emails.”
HEDV87
“The . She didn't grade any work until the semester was literally over.”
HEDR114

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are not the main focus, but the as hard; .

Few testsTests can be hardParticipation-based points

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

beyond general coursework and grading issues.

Homework-heavyParticipation matters
“ but not to bad”
HEDR114

Online

Online reviews mention a couple of and module work; .

Few hard testsDiscussion modulesExtra credit
“The but there's only a couple of them.”
HEDV87
“Lots of opportunities.”
HEDV87

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and neither grades for months or answer emails.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews (9 online, 2 in , and mixed recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

😕 Organization & Engagement

30/100

“This class was unorganized and the .”

⏱️

28/100

“She didn't grade any work until the semester was literally over.”

👍 Occasional Strength

70/100

“Ms. Meadows' teaching style is: unconventional, ”

Theme 1

🖥️ About Online Experience

  • Is not engaging with students in online courses
  • Sets up modules wrong
  • Pre-recorded lectures with

Theme 2

📬 About Communication

  • Wants you to text her if you have a problem and then gets mad when you reach out
  • Texts or e-mails went unanswered
  • She never answered any concerns I had until after the

Theme 3

📈 About Grades & Work

  • Lots of opportunities
  • Do the work and you will pass
  • Very caring and a but offers

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

11 reviews spanning 2019-2024 with mixed but and organization; sample is decent though polarized.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 54
2 out of 54
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HEDV877 reviews
HEDR1144 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 2

B range

5

B 5

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2