AI Rate Professor

English

Melinda Zeman

ENGV01B · V01A · VO1B · VO1A · ENGLV01B · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
12.5%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid unless you are fully self-directed and prepared for and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProAbsent instructorTough graderPoor communicationHeavy homeworkVague instructions
  • Students report long absences, ignored emails, and
  • and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

Tough grading, missing feedback, and effort.

Online ; the one strong positive is an older in-person review.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

, and unclear prompts raise the real difficulty beyond average English.

Both formats mention lots of homework and reading, especially online.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

while others do not, with little clarity overall.

Online attendance reports conflict; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Most students explicitly say avoid due to absence, ignored emails, and .

Negative consensus is strongest in online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

16/100

and stories of harsh essay judgment with little support.

Format shift

Online students report the .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Lots of homework, papers, and .

Format shift

Workload complaints appear in both formats.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students describe absence for months, ignored messages, vague prompts, and unprofessional communication.

Format shift

, but later evidence is strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Course centers , and textbook work rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One older positive review contrasts with a later critique of vague instructions and .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“She is very vague when it comes .”
V01A
“ and truly wants her students to do well in her class.”
VO1A

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections dominate complaints about absence, ignored messages, AI accusations, and .

Main concern

Little instructor presence and .

What students said

“Accuses my work of being ai then when I offer and gives me a C-.”
ENGV01B
“Absent Professor, late to give feedback, does not respond .”
VO1B
“She is an absent .”
ENGLV01B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on papers and discussions; they .

Essay-heavy assessmentDiscussion postsTextbook-based assignments

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews also focus on essays and .

EssaysDiscussion posts
“I went from an 92% to an 80% for my grade because she judged my essay on a random sentence she picked in my intro as my thesis.”
V01A

Online

Online evidence emphasizes papers, discussion posts, and .

EssaysDiscussion postsTextbook work
“Since the beginning of the semester she had graded 2 out of the 20 assignments she had assigned.”
V01A
“She wont provide examples or write down fully the prompt for the assignment.”
ENGV01B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Overall if she had been my first professor, my college career would have been nonexistent. !”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews with heavy online weighting and low recommendation consensus. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Presence

18/100

“Absent Professor, late to give feedback, does not respond .”

📉

16/100

“ and will give no credit. !”

📬 Communication Failure

20/100

“Very poor communication, I sent many emails and canvas messages and she ignored them.”

👎 Recommendation

12/100

“ and professor.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • unprofessional and was not involved with her class for 3 months
  • zero support for an on-line class
  • vague when it comes to instructions

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • heavily and overly criticizes your work

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Lots of homework
  • Get ready to read
  • prepare to read old people literature

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only 8 reviews, mostly negative and online, with consistent themes but limited sample size and mixed older evidence.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 56

Course coverage

V01A3 reviews
ENGV01B2 reviews
ENGLV01B1 review
VO1A1 review
VO1B1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 3