AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Anna Tivy

MATHV21 · MATHV03 · MATHV01 · MATH05 · MATHV44 · V03 · MATHVO3 · MATHV04 · MATHV12 · MATHV40 · MATHV22 · MATHV38 · STATS · MATHV038 · MATHV10 · CALC21B · MATHVO4 · MATHV05 · ALGEBRAMATHV03 · MATHV20 · 56 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
45.83%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if and attend; struggling math students may want a clearer lecturer.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots of homeworkExtra creditRussian accentTough graderCaring but demanding
  • some love her care and
  • and attendance matter for success
  • and retries help, but many say you work hard for the grade

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

As are possible with effort and , but daily homework and .

Online multi-attempt homework softens the path; and strict for some.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Math content and pace feel hard for many; average difficulty is mid-high and reviews stress heavy study.

Online can feel slightly more flexible; in-person lectures and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

and warn that skipping makes you fall behind or lose grade boosts.

; in-person is usually required.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

46/100

; success stories and .

but smaller; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

and and long exams pull fairness down.

Format shift

Online often more lenient on attempts; .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of daily or and projects dominate student complaints.

Format shift

; online sometimes adds discussions and notes.

Teaching experience

Average

54/100

Caring and knowledgeable for supporters, but many cite , accent, and cold tone.

Format shift

Online quality swings with video support; .

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

and exams; some group tests and presentation finals appear.

Format shift

Online emphasizes multi-attempt homework/quizzes; and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

46 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

; accent and pace frustrate some while others praise shortcuts and care.

Main concern

, and hard-to-follow lectures for struggling students.

What students said

“I passed the hardest class on earth during summer with the most cold hearted professor on the planet”
MATHV44
“I loved Ms. Tivy. She is an exceptional teacher and really dedicates herself to her subject.”
MATHV20

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online experiences range from flexible multi-attempt homework to inaccessible Covid-era lecture gaps.

Main concern

Some terms relied on YouTube instead of live teaching and felt hard to reach.

What students said

“She provided ample attempts and , and exams.”
MathV22
“She stopped making lecture videos after the 7th week and would only pin videos from YouTube and the textbook.”
MATHV05

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

timed fill-ins; friendliness varies by term.

Fill-in testsTimed long examsNotes allowed sometimesMulti-attempt online tests

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and time-pressured; some courses allow notes or group tests.

Long timed examsFill-in questionsNotes allowed sometimesGroup tests
“ of time allocated.”
MATHV21
“She let the class use notes for the .”
MATH05

Online

and generous time windows.

Multiple exam attemptsUnlimited homework tries
“you have unlimited tries on the and 2 tries for each test.”
MATHV40
“She provided ample attempts and , and exams.”
MathV22

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want an A, you will get one with effort put in. Lots of ”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (4 online, 46 in-person), highlighting workload, polarity, and grade effort. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“She assigns alot of HW and it is also important to do the HW to understand the material.”

🎯 Teaching Split

54/100

“She's really bad at teaching, grades very harsh, assigns loads of work and .”

❤️ Care &

70/100

“ and really wants you to succeed.”

👍 Recommendation Split

46/100

“ . Every time I go into and lost.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She has a Russian accent, but nothing that you can't easily adjust to.
  • The lectures are grueling and she is the .
  • She shows good shortcuts.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of homework
  • If you want an A, you will get one with effort put in.
  • of time allocated.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She seems intimidating but is actually very sweet and wants her students to pass
  • I strongly disliked this professor... she is rude and not helpful
  • She's great. Took asynchronous and a lot of her lectures were just youtube videos.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

56

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over many years with and accent support solid confidence despite polarity.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 519
3 out of 514
2 out of 53
1 out of 58

Course coverage

MATHV449 reviews
MATHV057 reviews
MATHV205 reviews
MATHV034 reviews
MATH053 reviews
Show 15 more courses
MATHV013 reviews
MATHV0382 reviews
MATHV042 reviews
MATHV102 reviews
MATHV382 reviews
V032 reviews
ALGEBRAMATHV031 review
CALC21B1 review
MATHV121 review
MATHV211 review
MathV221 review
MATHV401 review
MATHVO31 review
MATHVO41 review
STATS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

21 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 2 · A 9

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 4