AI Rate Professor

History

Josh Lieser

HISTR101A · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

and harsh for others, with very thin evidence.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough GraderHeavy ReadingMixed OnlineClear CriteriaInconsistent
  • Only two online reviews exist and they sharply conflict on teaching quality.
  • Work includes discussions, reading quizzes, and a .
  • One student earned an A with while .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

One A came via ; the other review paints grading as arbitrary and harsh.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Reading quizzes, discussions, and a somewhat difficult final paper make the content moderately demanding rather than light.

; .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

88/100

Both reviews .

Evidence is entirely from online sections.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

; the other says do not bother, leaving recommendation split.

Split 50-50 from two online reviews with no in-person data.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and odd mark-downs; tags repeatedly say Tough grader.

Format shift

Online-only evidence consistently labels him a .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Not overwhelming for one student, but lots of homework and and the negative review.

Format shift

Workload comments exist only for online HISTR101A.

Teaching experience

Average

40/100

One student found clear organization; the other found lesson plans headache-inducing and teaching poor.

Format shift

Teaching quality claims conflict across the two online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Discussions, reading quizzes, annotations, and ; .

Format shift

Online assessments are discussion and paper based.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Both reviews are online HISTR101A: one finds the and a path to an A, the other calls teaching and .

Main concern

Tough, picky grading plus one scathing report that lesson plans and .

What students said

“ and did not assign overwhelming amounts of work. Had discussions and reading quizzes.”
HISTR101A
“He is bad at teaching and and grammar are atrocious but expects yours to be perfect, he will mark you wrong on the weirdest things”
HISTR101A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments center on discussions, reading quizzes, and a .

Reading QuizzesDiscussion PostsFinal PaperExtra Credit Discussion

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Reviews describe discussions, reading quizzes, and a ; no webcam or Lockdown Browser details are stated.

Discussion PostsReading QuizzesFinal PaperExtra Credit
“Had discussions and reading quizzes. but can be done.”
HISTR101A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Was very organized and did not assign overwhelming amounts of work. Had discussions and reading quizzes. but can be done.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 conflicting online reviews only. Credibility rating: Low.

⚖️

28/100

“ and wants precise annotations and detailed posts.”

📚 Reading Load

45/100

“Get ready to read”

👎 Polarized Experience

40/100

“Don't bother.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I got an A in the class thanx to the discussion

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • trying to follow his lesson plans will give you a headache

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two online reviews years apart conflict sharply, so confidence in any single portrait is low.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HISTR101A2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values