AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Christopher Fredrick

MATHV46 · MATHV44 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
14.29%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid unless and online videos.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTextbook readerConfusing lecturesSelf-taught requiredLots of homeworkUnhelpful
  • Students say he reads from the textbook and .
  • Heavy and YouTube leaves many lost.
  • ; teaching quality is widely rated poor.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

One note says tests are pretty easy, but and .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Students report high stress, unknown terminology, and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

and others not; overall enforcement is inconsistent in reviews.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

About 14% would take again; most call the class poorly run and unhelpful.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Little grade detail; one student found tests fairly easy but grades entered late and structure feels chaotic.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Lots of and videos.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

, and expecting students to learn alone.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and tests appear, with little in-class practice.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math lectures are widely described as .

Main concern

and heavy homework make homework nearly impossible without outside videos.

What students said

“ and throws videos at you expecting you to understand. doesnt actually teach just reads out of textbook.”
MATHV44
“He didn't translate math into good-quality notes. Used terminology we didn't even know of.”
MATHV46
“I've only been to four classes of his and !”
MATHV44

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; while teaching quality remains the main complaint.

Tests fairly easy (limited reports)Homework platform heavyLecture from textbook

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; one student notes tests are pretty easy despite weak lectures.

Tests pretty easyXYZ Homework / MyStatLab
“Although I do not like the way he teaches, he is willing to work with you during his office hours and .”
MATHV44

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and throws videos at you expecting you to understand. doesnt actually teach just reads out of textbook.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews, highlighting weak instruction and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“doesnt actually teach just reads out of textbook.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

15/100

“Poorly ran class Im sorry for those who have him.”

📚 Workload Pain

25/100

“when i got home to even do my homework, id look at the notes from the class and .”

🧠 Course Challenge

28/100

“He used terminology we didn't even know of.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • ! He just repeats the same thing that .
  • Reads straight out of the textbook during his lectures. No sample problems are given.
  • He gives youtube videos and expects the students to figure it out on their own.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • I only went to class 3 times and i was already stressed out of my mind.
  • Doesnt put grades into system till the end of semester.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Only 7 reviews but they are recent and highly consistent about weak teaching.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATHV445 reviews
MATHV462 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1