AI Rate Professor

History

Scott Corbett

HISTV07 · HISTVO7 · HISTV01B · HIST07 · HISTV07A · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

Avoid unless you have no alternative and are ready for , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderHarsh feedbackHeavy readingSubjective gradingAvoid
  • 0% would-take-again and .
  • Harsh, meticulous grading and for uncertain reward.
  • A minority praise him as a strong lecturer who rewards participation with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

24/100

Harsh meticulous grading, subjective deductions, and .

Online and ; sample is small.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

, and high reading load make content and pace demanding.

Difficulty theme is consistent across formats.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

Limited direct attendance detail; participation is expected and .

Sparse evidence; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Would-take-again is 0% and .

Both online reviews urge avoidance; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

14/100

Students report , and extreme plagiarism standards.

Format shift

and in person.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

, and constant reading produce a heavy load.

Format shift

In-person older reviews detail books and essays; online stresses reading and participation.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

A few respect his knowledge and lectures, but many cite bad attitude, yelling, and .

Format shift

The only strong teaching praise is older in-person; recent online is very negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

38/100

Essays, papers, reading, and participation outweigh simple multiple-choice testing.

Format shift

and papers; online focuses on graded writing and feedback.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and heavy workload, with a couple calling him a great but difficult lecturer.

Main concern

, and non-negotiable grades.

What students said

“This teacher was very condescending and not helpful.”
HISTV07
“Yes, he IS difficult, but also a great lecturer & one of .”
HISTV01B
“horrendous workload and .”
HISTV07A

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and .

Main concern

and aggressive plagiarism scrutiny with .

What students said

“ . AT ALL COSTS!”
HIST07
“He is a and will look .”
HISTV01B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is paper- and reading-heavy with .

Harsh paper gradingMultiple essaysTough testsHeavy readingSubjective standards

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and heavy reading with little grade flexibility.

Multiple essaysTough testsMultiple books required
“He is a so you better check your own work over and over before you turn it in.”
HIST07
“He never gave us a test, but a .”
HISTV07A

Online

Online evidence stresses tough grading and .

Tough graderStrict plagiarism standard
“ .”
HISTV01B
“he will mark you for plagiarism for even utilizing the source material.”
HISTV01B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . AT ALL COSTS!”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 History reviews with limited and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Recommendation

12/100

“ . AT ALL COSTS!”

⚖️

14/100

“He is a and will look .”

📚 Workload

22/100

“horrendous workload and .”

🎯 Rare Teaching Praise

55/100

“Yes, he IS difficult, but also a great lecturer & one of .”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • will NOT negotiate on grades

Theme 2

😤 About Character

  • very condescending and not helpful
  • bad attitude and provides no assistance
  • felt he was rude to the students

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • great lecturer
  • Scott knows his stuff
  • expects you to participate and speak up in class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only 9 reviews, sparse grade data, and older in-person comments mixed with recent online negatives; but sample is thin.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

HISTV01B3 reviews
HIST072 reviews
HISTV07A2 reviews
HISTV071 review
HISTVO71 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values