AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Elton Hollon

PHILV02 · PHILV01 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
90%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take him for an and a realistic path to an A.

Best fit · Easy A HunterClear grading criteriaGives good feedbackCaringGraded by few thingsEasy A
  • Online ethics and intro philosophy courses are manageable with and .
  • Most students report easy A grades through discussions, quizzes, and a .
  • Workload stays light especially in short summer formats if you keep up with weekly posts.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Students repeatedly call it an easy A if , and hit the pass threshold.

Most easy-A evidence comes from online reviews; the .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

Content is accessible intro ethics material, though and weekly writing.

Online and in-person comments both describe beginner-friendly philosophy content.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

and some optional online sections.

Online reviews show both mandatory and ; .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

91/100

Nearly all reviewers would take him again and .

Recommendation strength is consistent across the larger online sample and the smaller in-person sample.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

, and high A rates make grades feel approachable.

Format shift

Online comments emphasize easy A paths more than the smaller in-person set.

Workload

Light

76/100

Typical load is a short quizzes, not crushing.

Format shift

Online summer sections especially stress manageable weekly posts.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students , and good at feedback without overloading the course.

Format shift

Praise for clarity and care is strongest in online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and a final essay more than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

; quizzes appear mainly online.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Limited in-person comments still describe easy reading-and-discussion pacing with .

Main concern

Sample size is small and one comment still notes lengthy discussion posts.

What students said

“Pretty easy class. Just reading and 1 discussion post per week.”
PHILV02
“I took his online ethics class it was super easy.”
PHILV01

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Students praise chill , and strong feedback in summer and regular online ethics courses.

Main concern

Some sections are textbook-heavy and if you procrastinate.

What students said

“I felt it was an easy A but still enjoyed the interaction and discussion.”
PHILV01
“work was not overwhelming and .”
PHILV01
“ and was certainly accessible through office hours and email.”
PHILV02

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly low-stakes discussions and exams.

Discussion postsFinal essayShort quizzesClear rubrics

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

84/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence mainly describes reading plus weekly discussion posts with .

Weekly discussion postsReading-based work
“Just reading and 1 discussion post per week.”
PHILV02

Online

, and sometimes midterm or final quizzes or a .

Weekly discussionsFinal essayMidterm and final quizzesClear rubrics
“Discussions every week with 150+ words, easy rubric to follow. 2 midterm quizzes and 1 final quiz.”
PHILV01
“ and its not bad”
PHILV01

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This was an Intro to Ethics online course. It was easy to follow and interesting. I felt it was an easy A but still enjoyed the interaction and discussion.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, , and light online workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“professor and tips.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

91/100

“ .”

⚖️ Easy A Path

86/100

“I felt it was an easy A but still enjoyed the interaction and discussion.”

📝 Manageable Workload

76/100

“work was not overwhelming and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • always willing to help students with whatever they need

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • I felt it was an easy A
  • Pretty easy class
  • you have to get above an 80% to pass the class

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • and a
  • total of 10
  • DO NOT procrastinate

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Ten detailed reviews span 2019-2026 with strong grade and quality consistency, though most evidence is online.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 56
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHILV016 reviews
PHILV024 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 2 · A 6

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values