AI Rate Professor

English

Irmgard Williams

ENGLVO3 · ENG02 · VOENG · ENG01 · ENG2020 · 1A · ENGVO3 · ENGLVO1A · ENGLV02 · ENGV02 · ENGV01A · ENGLV01A · 44 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
56.52%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you can handle a blunt style and will use rewrite chances; skip if you need a gentle classroom climate.

Best fit · Effort For RewardRewrite essays for full creditTough graderSo many papersStrong personalityNo textbook
  • if you keep submitting and revising.
  • others.
  • Attendance and classroom conduct matter; she can call students out publicly.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Frequent rewrite opportunities and many A/A+ reports make high grades reachable if you persist.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Work is mostly essays done in class/lab with , though volume of .

All evidence is in-person.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

Many say be on time and ; some list mandatory, and she polices phones and tardiness strictly.

All evidence is in-person with .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Roughly half love her honesty and rewrite policy; recent reviews often warn of rudeness or targeting.

All reviews are in-person; tone has become more polarized in newer comments.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

, but unlimited or frequent rewrites often restore full credit if you engage.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person.

Workload

Light

64/100

and often no textbook, but regular essays and .

Format shift

All evidence is in-person.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Strong for students who connect with her blunt style; weak for those who experience call-outs or vague criteria.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Class is paper-driven with rewrites; quizzes and .

Format shift

All evidence is in-person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

44 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

All reviews are in person and split between easy rewrite-based As and serious complaints about harshness, public shaming, and unfair treatment.

Main concern

Strong personality and public call-outs can make the class feel hostile for some students.

What students said

“she always gives you a chance to rewrite and get full credit and .”
ENGLV01A
“She would target certain students and embarrass them in front of the entire class for no reason.”
ENGLV02
“She is an easy professor but she is rude. She gives you the chance to rewrite all your essays which makes the class easy to pass. Easy A”
ENGLV01A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is almost entirely essays with rewrite chances rather than strict proctored exams.

Essay rewritesIn-class essaysFew or no quizzesNo textbook often

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

76/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and little emphasis on timed proctored exams.

Essay rewritesWeekly papersIn-class writingNo textbook
“she always gives you a chance to rewrite and get full credit and .”
ENGLV01A
“She is an easy professor but she is rude. She gives you the chance to rewrite all your essays which makes the class easy to pass. Easy A”
ENGLV01A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is an easy professor but she is rude. She gives you the chance to rewrite all your essays which makes the class easy to pass. Easy A”

Voice snapshots generated from 44 in-person reviews, balancing rewrite-based easy As against repeated concerns about tone and targeting. Credibility rating: High.

📝 Rewrite Path To A

78/100

“ALWAYS GIVES AN AND .”

⚠️ Polarizing Personality

35/100

“She would target certain students and embarrass them in front of the entire class for no reason.”

👍 When It Clicks

85/100

“MS. . DOESNT USE A TEXTBOOK. ALWAYS GIVES AN ”

👎 Harsh Classroom Climate

30/100

“She's also something of a bully, and pulled strange power moves over many students while I took her class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's a bit boring at times but she's still a good teacher
  • Shes Very Honest.
  • she is really cool, and very helpful

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A
  • you can get an A EASILY
  • there's no reason you can't get an A

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • She made me CRY twice
  • super passive aggressive
  • To a certain extent she can humiliate students by lecturing you in front of everyone

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

44

Recent reviews read by the AI

44

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

44 in-person reviews across many years with rich detail and consistent dual themes of easy rewrites versus harsh personality.

Inside 44 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 522
4 out of 59
3 out of 53
2 out of 55
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ENGLV01A19 reviews
ENGLV0210 reviews
ENG023 reviews
ENGV023 reviews
ENGLVO32 reviews
Show 7 more courses
1A1 review
ENG011 review
ENG20201 review
ENGLVO1A1 review
ENGV01A1 review
ENGVO31 review
VOENG1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

25 reported outcomes

A range

19

A+ 8 · A 11

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1