AI Rate Professor

Ethnic Studies

Francisco Fuentes

CHSTV01 · ETHSV01 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
15.38%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid unless you have no choice and , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHeavy Reading LoadBoring LecturesMandatory AttendanceTreats Students Like Kids
  • Most students report , and mandatory attendance with little payoff.
  • Lectures are widely called boring, repetitive, or off-topic, and .
  • Online sections but and papers.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Some students earn As, but tough grading, heavy papers, and .

Online reviews more often report As with heavy work; and C-range outcomes.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Concepts are not advanced for many, but volume of , and .

Online comments call content easy but expectations extreme; and lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and heavily graded even when lectures feel low value.

; several online reviews report attendance not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

16/100

Low take-again rate and reviews.

; online is mixed but still often negative on workload.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and hard grading complaints dominate, even when some students still land As.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Constant reading, discussion posts, papers, and .

Format shift

Both formats report heavy work; online short terms still require whole books and heavy posts.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Students repeatedly call lectures boring, repetitive, off-agenda, or childish and say they learned on their own.

Format shift

In-person teaching complaints are harsher; online focuses more on coursework design than live lecture quality.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grade , and projects rather than pure exams.

Format shift

Online and and papers; a hard final is mentioned in a few reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students , and lectures that feel irrelevant or childish.

Main concern

and the workload.

What students said

“Try your hardest not to take this professor. though we usually just watch movies and listen to him talk about the same thing over and over.”
ETHSV01
“Very strict, extremely boring lectures, lots of horrible”
ETHSV01
“If you're thinking about taking this class, mark my words I 100% do not recommend this.”
ETHSV01

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and discussion posts; content itself is not advanced but volume is high and some students still call it a mistake.

Main concern

and intro-level courses feeling like graduate workload.

What students said

“This course was not difficult in nature, but the expectations are blasphemous. In this course, there is an extreme amount of reading.”
ETHSV01
“this course is an introduction class and it feels like an MBA/PHD course with the amount of work you need to do.”
ETHSV01
“ . Just show your in-text citations and you'll be fine.”
CHSTV01

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are not the main grade driver, but the if .

Hard FinalReading-Based ExamEssays and Midterms Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and emphasize papers and discussions more than exam logistics.

Insane Final MentionedMany PapersDiscussion Heavy
“the ”
ETHSV01
“ and lots of essays.”
ETHSV01

Online

Online reviews mention a if material was not read, with and questions.

Hard Final If UnpreparedDiscussion PostsQuestions-Based Assignments
“The if you didn't read the material.”
ETHSV01

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Try your hardest not to take this professor. though we usually just watch movies and listen to him talk about the same thing over and over.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews spanning online and , and grading. Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Quality

22/100

“Everything I learned was on my own. Lectures were repetitive, he treats us like we are kids, and the .”

🚫 Recommendation

16/100

“If you're thinking about taking this class, mark my words I 100% do not recommend this.”

📚 Workload Crush

22/100

“This course was not difficult in nature, but the expectations are blasphemous. In this course, there is an extreme amount of reading.”

📝

28/100

“Very strict, extremely boring lectures, lots of horrible”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Boring and repetitive lectures
  • Talked over students whenever it was appropriate to ask questions
  • treats students like little kids

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • he is a and irrelevant lectures
  • the
  • . Just show your in-text citations and you'll be fine.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • extreme amount of reading
  • and lots of essays
  • Too much work that doesn't translate into learning.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen recent detailed reviews across online and in-person formats show strong , and teaching tone.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 59

Course coverage

ETHSV0111 reviews
CHSTV012 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 4