AI Rate Professor

Anatomy

Behnaz Parhami Seren

ANATVO1 · ANATV01 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid unless you have no alternative; students across online and and no support.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderTest heavyTypos in questionsUnhelpful emailsTimed exams too short
  • All nine reviews give quality 1 with
  • Students report exams with 100 questions in about 101 minutes, typos, and
  • Communication is repeatedly called rude, unhelpful, or condescending

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Even students who earn A or A- , and graded to find any wrong answer.

Both online and ; A grades still come with quality-1 ratings.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

8/100

Every review rates difficulty 5 with , and little instructional support.

Consistent high difficulty across online and in-person anatomy sections.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

, but tags and older comments warn skipping means you will not pass.

Online ; in-person includes mandatory and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

and repeated run-away language across every review.

and in-person comments.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

and students say she finds any way to mark answers wrong.

Format shift

and in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

, and extreme exam pressure.

Format shift

Homework and tags, but online is also test-heavy.

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

All quality ratings are 1; students call her unhelpful, rude, and an awful lecturer despite subject knowledge.

Format shift

and in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Comments center on quizzes and .

Format shift

Both formats are test heavy; online also stresses quiz and assignment language nitpicks.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and exams, rude emails, and .

Main concern

100-question mixed exams with about 101 minutes and study guides that .

What students said

“She has so many typos in her quiz and ”
ANATV01
“her exams are 100 questions and she only gives you 101 minutes”
ANATVO1
“the guides”
ANATV01

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online anatomy , and unhelpful or rude responses when students ask for help.

Main concern

and little support destroy even strong students' grades.

What students said

“she grades so , and assignments”
ANATV01
“ and questions that barely cover topics learned in class.”
ANATV01
“gives you 100 questions with a 101 minutes to take the ”
ANATV01

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are consistently described as and little clarity.

100 questions in 101 minutesMixed multiple choice and short answerTypos in questionsTests mismatch study guides

Assessment risk

Strict

15/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as 100 mixed questions in about 101 minutes that often do not match study guides.

100 questions101 minutesMultiple choice and short answerStudy guides mismatch tests
“her exams are 100 questions and she only gives you 101 minutes”
ANATVO1
“the guides”
ANATV01

Online

Online reviews report extremely hard timed exams, short limits, and poorly worded questions; .

Extremely hard testsShort time limits100 questions in 101 minutesTypos and unclear wording
“ and not enough time.”
ANATVO1
“gives you 100 questions with a 101 minutes to take the and not all of them are multiple choice”
ANATV01

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the . She does not care about a student's success and blames them for not understanding a question when in reality it's her typos that make a question impossible to understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews (6 online, 3 in person), all quality 1, focusing on exam timing, typos, and unhelpful communication. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

8/100

“One of the .”

🧪

15/100

“her exams are 100 questions and she only gives you 101 minutes”

💬 Helpfulness

10/100

“she is very rude when a student asks questions via e-mail.”

⚖️

10/100

“Finds any way to mark you wrong.”

Theme 1

📝 About Exams

  • and not enough time.
  • gives you 100 questions with a 101 minutes
  • the guides

Theme 2

💬 About Communication

  • Condescending attitude towards respectful students
  • she is very rude when a student asks questions via e-mail.

Theme 3

📉 About Grades & Fairness

  • I find it ironic that she grades so harshly
  • Finds any way to mark you wrong.
  • this class was like it was made so that nobody passes

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Nine fully consistent quality-1 reviews with detailed complaints across 2018-2022 make the negative pattern highly credible.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 59

Course coverage

ANATV017 reviews
ANATVO12 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 1 · A- 2

B range

4

B 2 · B- 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values