AI Rate Professor

Music

César Mateus

MUSIC37 · MUSVO6 · MUSIC44 · MUSV36 · GUITAMUS · MUSV06 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Avoid unless you already play and only need an ; multiple red flags on temperament and safety.

Best fit · Self Taught ProImpatient and short temperLenient online reading classTest heavy online tagsSerious safety concerns reported
  • Online music history sections can be easy with few graded items and lots of reading.
  • , and poor teaching for beginners.
  • One detailed review alleges serious misconduct; treat as high-risk and verify with official sources.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Reported grades include A and A+; online comments say few graded items and if you turn work in.

Online reviews stress few graded items and ; and more about teaching tone.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Online content is not hard but reading-heavy; beginner guitar in person is often described as poorly taught and frustrating.

Online history/rock is easier; fit.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

and in person, though some older reviews omit it.

Online has ; several in-person listings say yes.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

, but many low quality scores and severe negative in-person experiences dominate.

Online students are more positive; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Online students call him a ; reported grades include A and A+.

Format shift

Leniency is clearest in online reviews; .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

; in-person guitar expects practice and being in tune.

Format shift

Online emphasizes reading and few submissions; in-person emphasizes practice and tuning.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Some online praise and skilled player notes, outweighed by impatience, yelling, off-topic riffs, and a serious misconduct allegation.

Format shift

Online experience is warmer; in-person experience is often harsh.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Tags include test heavy and graded by few things; assignments and tests both appear depending on course.

Format shift

Online tags mention tests and few graded items; and practice.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and off-topic; beginners are steered to other instructors while serious intermediate players may get more help.

Main concern

Yelling, short temper, and a serious alleged misconduct report that students should treat as a major risk signal.

What students said

“There are not enough characters allowed in this review to detail the ongoing, systematic sexual predation I experienced”
MUSVO6
“ unless you like to be yelled at.”
MUSV36
“He has no patience whatsoever.”
MUSIC44

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online rock/history style sections are enjoyable and fairly easy with few graded assignments but and .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Some of the and the .”
MUSV06
“I'd say he's a but there's a lot of reading.”
MUSVO6

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Online tags mention test-heavy work and few graded items; reviews .

Test HeavyFew Graded ItemsLots of Reading

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring policies.

Online

Online reviews mention tests and a handful of ; proctoring is not clearly described.

Test HeavyFew Graded ItemsLots of Reading
“ ”
MUSV06
“There's only a handful of , so make sure you turn everything in.”
MUSVO6

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ unless you like to be yelled at.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews (2 online, 7 in person), highlighting format split and major risk themes. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Serious Red Flag

5/100

“There are not enough characters allowed in this review to detail the ongoing, systematic sexual predation I experienced”

🔥 Temper Issues

25/100

“Short temper and gets off topic easily”

📚 Easy Online Option

75/100

“I'd say he's a but there's a lot of reading.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He has no patience whatsoever
  • Short temper and gets off topic easily
  • you gotta get him to slow down the pace

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • the class isn't difficult but there's a lot of reading
  • There's only a handful of
  • if you're a

Theme 3

⚠️ About Safety Concerns

  • ongoing, systematic sexual predation I experienced
  • I wish to spare other women

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews spanning 2008-2022 with and one high-severity allegation that increases caution.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MUSV062 reviews
MUSV362 reviews
MUSVO62 reviews
GUITAMUS1 review
MUSIC371 review
Show 1 more courses
MUSIC441 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values