Russel Sanders

PHIL01 · PHILV01 · PHIL101 · PHILOS120 · PHILV101 · PHIL1 · PHIL3435 · ONLINPHIL · PHILV02 · PHILR102 · PHIL102 · PHILV05 · PHILOSOPHYV05 · PHILOSOPHY · PHILVO1 · PHIOS106 · PHILV01W · NUR330 · 48 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 28/100
RMP rating: 2.5/5
Take again: 40%
Difficulty: 3.9

The decision

Avoid unless you want a confrontational philosophy challenge and can write exactly to his standards.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderSubjective DiscussionsRude ToneHigh EgoChallenging Thinker

Large volume of reviews call him rude, biased, and nearly .
A smaller group says he is brilliant and if you want hard philosophical challenge.
Grammar nitpicking, tricky quizzes, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A usually means perfect writing, agreeing with his views, and .

Both online and ; online complaints are especially intense.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

, and demanding discussion logic make the content feel hard even for strong students.

Online and ; STEM majors also report struggle online.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

and kick out early leavers, while .

In-person comments show stricter room rules; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Most students warn others away due to rudeness and bias despite a minority who love the intellectual challenge.

Avoid tone is strong in both formats; a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

issues, and claims that only agreeing views earn high marks dominate.

Format shift

; in-person echoes harsh standards.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of reading, weekly discussions, and load.

Format shift

and discussion work.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Average quality near 2.5 with many students calling him rude, unhelpful, or biased, offset by a few inspired fans.

Format shift

Negative tone is stronger online; .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and occasional in-class checks, with discussions often carrying heavy weight.

Format shift

Online centers on discussions and quizzes; and CNC finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

many report ego, bias, and , while some praise deep critical thinking.

Main concern

Personality clashes and grade bias for agreeing with him dominate student risk.

What students said

“hands down the ”
PHILV01

“He is a but he deliberately challenges how you think.”
PHIL102

“ and straightforward (just read and you will be good).”
PHILV02

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online students often call him the , and little help.

Main concern

Discussion posts feel unwinnable and .

What students said

“Professor Sanders is the .”
PHILV01

“if you say yes, regardless of and give you the lowest grade.”
PHILR102

“ .”
PHILV01

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes and discussion posts are often described as tricky or impossible to perfect, with strict grammar and viewpoint scrutiny.

Tricky quizzesDiscussion-heavy gradingTake-home quizzes sometimesNo midterm or final sometimesGrammar-focused scoring

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments mention online or , and strict classroom rules.

Online quizzesTake-home quizzesIn-class 5-point quizzesCNC final sometimes

“Quizzes on BB are not that difficult, 5 point quiz at the beginning of each class... .”
PHIOS106

“Online class with one small textbook. Read a chapter a week and complete an online quiz.”
PHILV01

Online

Online reviews highlight brutal discussion questions, difficult quizzes, and .

Difficult quizzesBrutal discussion postsSubjective gradingNo midterm or final sometimes

“ no matter what you answer, he can come back and state that you're wrong.”
PHILV01

“Very difficult quizes but .”
PHILV01W

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“ if at all possible.”
Voice snapshots generated from 48 reviews (7 online, 41 in , and a minority of challenge-seeking fans. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

34/100

“Sanders is the ! I took his online Intro to Philosophy class and he is does not teach, he is rude, unhelpful and an all around horrible teacher.”

⚖️

18/100

“ .”

🧠 Intellectual Challenge

70/100

“He is a but he deliberately challenges how you think.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

He is very loud and very opinionated
Kinda felt like communicating with a drill Sargent
Sanders is a real life philosopher, not just a teacher

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

Over half of the class failed!
if you don't agree with him then your going to fail
Look elsewhere for an easy grade

Theme 3

⚠️ About Tone and Bias

He is an absolute jerk!
This guy is insufferable
Don't say God exists

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-eight reviews over many years with highly consistent themes of and personality conflict yield strong confidence.

Inside 48 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512

4 out of 54

3 out of 52

2 out of 515

1 out of 515

Course coverage

PHILV0117 reviews

PHILV026 reviews

PHILR1024 reviews

PHILV054 reviews

PHIL1012 reviews

Show 13 more courses

PHIL1022 reviews

PHILV01W2 reviews

NUR3301 review

ONLINPHIL1 review

PHIL011 review

PHIL11 review

PHIL34351 review

PHILOS1201 review

PHILOSOPHY1 review

PHILOSOPHYV051 review

PHILV1011 review

PHILVO11 review

PHIOS1061 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

No reported values

B range

B+ 1 · B 4 · B- 2

C range

No reported values

D range

D+ 1

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1

Russel Sanders

Avoid unless you want a confrontational philosophy challenge and can write exactly to his standards.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

HardWork

Challenging

Varies

Avoid

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🎯 Teaching Quality

⚖️ x x

🧠 Intellectual Challenge

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

⚠️ About Tone and Bias

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

⚖️