AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Nina Jaramillo

NS20 · NS20NS30 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Strong pick for nursing lecture and clinical if you want a .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyAmazing LecturesHilariousClear ExpectationsStrong Clinical GuideSupportive Feedback
  • Students praise humor-filled lectures that make nursing content relatable and memorable.
  • Clinical guidance and and make care plans more manageable.
  • Expectations and ; attendance matters and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Grades reported as A+ and B+ with ; you still need to learn lecture material and engage, not coast.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Nursing content is real work at moderate difficulty, but humor and guidance lower the .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

and skip-class tags warn you will not pass without showing up.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

and highlights humor, clarity, fairness, and clinical support.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Described as fair and ; grades look solid when students engage with lecture content.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Clinical care plans and lecture study matter, but students say she makes the load more manageable.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Amazing lectures, clinical coaching, humor, and extra explanations create a consistently strong learning experience.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

; clinical tools and care plans also matter but lecture is the .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and clear: humorous lectures, strong clinical coaching, fair testing on lecture material, and consistently high would-take-again.

Main concern

and the course still demands real nursing study effort.

What students said

“No cap, her sense of humor in her lectures and stories make the content we are learning easy to relate to.”
NS20
“SUPER EDUCATIONAL AND SUPER FRIENDLY. this professor really goes above and beyond to make sure you know your stuff.”
NS20
“Dr. . She tests based on lecture primarily.”
NS20NS30

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; reviews do not mention open-book or online proctoring tools.

Lecture-based testsClear grading criteriaIn-person exams

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

expectations and fair grading.

Lecture-based testsClear expectations
“ . She is fair and nice.”
NS20NS30

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“SUPER EDUCATIONAL AND SUPER FRIENDLY. this professor really goes above and beyond to make sure you know your stuff.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person nursing reviews, highlighting lecture humor, clarity, and clinical support. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“No cap, her sense of humor in her lectures and stories make the content we are learning easy to relate to.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

95/100

“ if I could.”

🧭 Clinical Support

90/100

“She is always guiding in clinical and gives you tools needed to succeed.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • her sense of humor in her lectures and stories make the content we are learning easy to relate to
  • Definitely takes the .
  • SUPER EDUCATIONAL AND SUPER FRIENDLY.

Theme 2

📋 About Expectations & Clinical

  • Dr. .
  • made the care plans much easier to do
  • She is always guiding in clinical and gives you tools needed to succeed.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only three recent-to-2019 in-person reviews exist; all are positive and detailed, but the tiny sample limits confidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

NS202 reviews
NS20NS301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1