AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Andrea Yusim

PHILV04 · PHILV01 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
27.27%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

unless you want a demanding philosophy course and will read constantly.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerLecture HeavyTest HeavyBoring LecturesMust Read TextbookStrict
  • Philosophy and logic content is hard and test-heavy
  • Lectures often feel boring or
  • A few students love her passion and extra help if they engage fully

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Students repeatedly say it is not an easy A and and reading.

; online reviews add boredom and toughness.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Logic and philosophy content is abstract, lecture-heavy, and .

Both formats describe hard content; online students especially call lectures sleep-inducing.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Many tags and comments say skip class and you will not pass, with phone call-outs.

In-person comments stress participation and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most reviewers would not take her again despite a minority of strong fans.

Online reviews are fully negative; in-person reviews are mixed but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

and nice final appears.

Format shift

; online mainly notes toughness.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Heavy lectures, lots of reading, and .

Format shift

and lecture time.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

She is kind and knowledgeable, but lectures often bore or fail to teach the hard material.

Format shift

In-person fans praise passion; online and .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Reviews emphasize tests and a grade split like 70 percent tests plus one paper.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

some find her passionate and fair, but many call logic and intro philosophy hard, lecture-heavy, and easy to hate.

Main concern

, and boring delivery for many students.

What students said

“If you're not extremely interested in logic, then you'll probably hate this class too.”
PHILV04
“it is really really hard to do well. Her class is 70 percent tests”
PHILV01
“She's one of the !”
PHILV04

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews call lectures boring or unhelpful and advise choosing another professor.

Main concern

Boring lectures that do not clarify hard material.

What students said

“BORING. Ridiculous lectures that will put you to sleep.”
PHILV01
“lectures wont help and you have to read your book”
PHILV01

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and are described as tough, with little evidence of open-book friendliness.

Test HeavyTough TestsLecture HeavyTextbook Dependent

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tough, with one note that the .

Test HeavyTough TestsSome Extra Credit Final
“Her class is 70 percent tests, and the other 30 percent is one paper.”
PHILV01
“ ”
PHILV04
“ ”
PHILV04

Online

Online reviews and mainly stress tough, lecture-heavy difficulty.

Tough GraderLecture Heavy
“I would suggest another teacher.”
PHILV01
“you have to read your book”
PHILV01

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you're not extremely interested in logic, then you'll probably hate this class too.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting lecture quality and test difficulty. Credibility rating: Medium.

😴 Boring Lectures

35/100

“BORING. Ridiculous lectures that will put you to sleep.”

📝 Test Heavy

35/100

“Her class is 70 percent tests, and the other 30 percent is one paper.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

30/100

“Try another teacher before Prof. Yusim.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures wont help and you have to read your book
  • Sooo very boring and .
  • She's lecture-heavy, but offers a lot of opportunities for class participation.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It's not an easy A
  • it is really really hard to do well.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She is a
  • loves what she teaches
  • She's one of the !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews with mixed but recurring themes of hardness and boring lectures give solid medium-high confidence.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 54

Course coverage

PHILV016 reviews
PHILV045 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values