AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Michelle Millea

VO1 · MATH3 · MATHV03 · MATHV01 · ENGRV01 · MATHVO1 · V01 · MATHVO3 · MTHVO1 · INTERMALGEBRA · MATHV04 · MATHV01A · ENGRENGR · ENGRV02 · ACCT202 · ENGENG1 · MATHV10 · V02 · ENGR3ENGR2 · MATH03 · 51 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you want a and will attend and do the homework.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear Math ExplainerCaring and SupportiveAttendance MattersPractice Exams HelpExtra Credit Options
  • Students repeatedly credit her with making algebra and .
  • She is caring, organized, and offers practice exams, feedback, and often , but expects attendance and .
  • A small minority find her strict or condescending online or in older sections, so show up ready to work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Many get solid grades with , and practice exams, and some call it an easy A with , but others report Cs and real work for success.

; online is more mixed.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

She makes algebra and intro engineering understandable for anxious beginners, though pace and .

Both formats praise clarity; engineering V01/V02 can feel busier.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and say skip class and you will not pass or will fall behind.

Both online and as required.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

About 75% would take again and the large majority call her best math teacher ever, with only a small harsh minority.

In-person enthusiasm is stronger and more numerous than the few online critiques.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Students mention dropping lowest grades, , honest but , and calculators allowed on tests.

Format shift

Leniency is clearest in in-person algebra; online comments are thinner.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

and sometimes called a lot, yet many say it is manageable, easy, or optional .

Format shift

Engineering sections report heavier paper load than some math sections.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

, and genuine care that converts math-phobic students.

Format shift

Excellent praise is strongest in-person; online is mostly positive with one sharp dissent.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and projects share weight rather than pure exam or pure assignment focus.

Format shift

; engineering adds group projects and papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

46 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

help after class, and fair structure with binders, homework, and practice tests, while a few call her strict or high-schoolish on phones and attendance.

Main concern

Attendance and phone rules are strict, and some .

What students said

“I have been horrible in math my entire life, and this woman not only encouraged me to do well, but helped me every step of the way.”
MATHV01A
“She teaches in a way I understand, with formulas and steps outlined with examples.”
MATHV01
“This teacher is really strict. She will get mad at you and scold you in front of the class.”
MATHVO1

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online students mostly say she adapts well on Zoom, communicates clearly, and reduces math anxiety, though one calls her condescending and better for stronger math students.

Main concern

One online math section felt condescending and too advanced for weaker students.

What students said

“she has made online school less of a burden. You will learn a lot about the engineering discipline.”
ENGRV01
“If ! THE BEST”
V01
“Very condescending and fake.”
MATHV01

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are straightforward with reviews and practice tests; some allow notes or calculators, without heavy proctoring details.

Practice ExamsCalculators AllowedNote Sheet SometimesClear Reviews

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

many, with pre-test reviews, occasional note pages, calculators, and cumulative finals.

Practice ExamsNo Trick QuestionsCalculators AllowedCumulative Final
“ .”
MATH3
“ .”
MATHV01
“The day of the is nice!!!”
MATHV01

Online

Online reviews focus on structure and communication more than proctoring; and practice materials support success.

Homework Follows ExamsPractice MaterialsClear Expectations
“The . The , and MyMathLab provided many opportunities to learn.”
MATHV01

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I have been horrible in math my entire life, and this woman not only encouraged me to do well, but helped me every step of the way.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (4 online, 46 in-person), highlighting clarity, care, and . Credibility rating: High.

🌟 Teaching Clarity

88/100

“Nobody .”

❤️ Student Support

85/100

“ you and .”

📅

22/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She explaines everything so well.
  • She and if you're having trouble she takes whatever time she needs to help.
  • and makes sure you are understanding the material.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • . Very manageable.
  • All the hw is so if you do it all and .
  • the work load is constant, but reasonable.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Easy to talk to and the method of teaching make it interesting.
  • Really is there for the students.
  • Teaching with a smile.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

51

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years with highly consistent praise for clarity and care, plus solid grade and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 540
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENGRV017 reviews
MATHV017 reviews
MATHV037 reviews
MATHVO14 reviews
MATH33 reviews
Show 16 more courses
MATHVO33 reviews
ENGRV022 reviews
MATHV01A2 reviews
MATHV102 reviews
V012 reviews
342141 review
ACCT2021 review
ENGENG11 review
ENGR3ENGR21 review
ENGRENGR1 review
INTERMALGEBRA1 review
MATH031 review
MATHV041 review
MTHVO11 review
V021 review
VO11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 6

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1