AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Louise Bretz

PHYS102 · MATHV10 · MATHV05 · MATHV1273193 · MATHV12 · MATH32203 · MATHV20 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you already handle fast math and will show up and study hard; many would pick someone else.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerFast-paced lecturesLots of homeworkTough examsSkip class and failInconsistent teaching
  • and name memorization, others call teaching example-only and confusing.
  • Workload is heavy with and .
  • and skipping hurts; Canvas and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Reported grades cluster around B with and , so an A takes real study time.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Students describe fast pace, skipped steps, and .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Multiple tags and comments say and skipping means you will not pass.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

40/100

Would-take-again is only about 43% with split praise for .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

and tests hard, but and grades are not described as arbitrary.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of , and repeated study-a-lot warnings define the load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Some find lectures helpful and caring; others say she only shows examples and cannot teach concepts well.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tags and comments emphasize tough exams and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person math and one physics stretch show caring moments and whiteboard help, but , and weak Canvas or feedback.

Main concern

, and limited email access frustrate many students.

What students said

“She goes out of her way to help her students and makes sure each one of them understands.”
MATHV1273193
“Doesn't teach concepts, only shows examples. Don't waste your money.”
PHYS102
“Her class is fast pace so make sure you put in the time to study, a lot.”
MATHV05

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are tough but doable with heavy study; so practice exams matter.

Tough examsPractice exams matterTest heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and study of practice tests; so tests carry weight.

Tough examsPractice examsTest heavy
“ , but doable if you study a lot.”
MATHV20
“Do the homework and the study the .”
MATHV20

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I have never been very good at math, but Ms. Bretz made a world of a difference in my understanding and appreciation of the subject.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 in-person reviews spanning math and physics, highlighting , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Teaching Quality Split

48/100

“Sure she knows Physics, but can't teach it to anyone.”

📝 Workload and Tests

28/100

“ , but doable if you study a lot.”

🚪

22/100

“Skip class? You won't pass.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and helps you out if you ask.
  • Doesn't teach concepts, only shows examples.
  • She skips a lot of steps when explaining the material.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • , but doable if you study a lot.
  • .
  • Do the homework and the study the .

Theme 3

📬 About Access and Feedback

  • so you have no clue what to study.
  • Not accessible over 2 days to answer emails.
  • She is picky about how she wants the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews spanning 2016-2021 with mixed detail; quality and tone split enough that confidence is only medium.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 54
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATHV102 reviews
MATHV202 reviews
PHYS1022 reviews
MATH322031 review
MATHV051 review
Show 2 more courses
MATHV121 review
MATHV12731931 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

6

B+ 1 · B 5

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values