AI Rate Professor

Criminal Justice

Peter Martinez

CJV08 · CJ27 · V18 · CJV27 · PAROLE · CJINTR · CJV25 · CJV01 · CRMINPROB · CJ01 · PROBPARO · CJCJ · PROPATIONPAR · PAROLEPROB · PROBPAR · CJV16 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
87.5%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Only take if you want field experience and ; expect and mixed clarity.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerWeekly quizzesField experience storiesOld-school no CanvasPolarized reviewsTough unclear grading
  • some praise real CJ experience and guest speakers; many call lectures boring and .
  • and board notes; .
  • Older reviews are , and subjective grades.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

You can pass if you copy board notes and , but many report tough or and Ds despite effort.

; no online sample.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

, and detail-heavy expectations make the material feel college-hard for many.

In-person only; difficulty ratings average high.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Weekly quizzes and attendance checks mean missing class costs you; and you will not pass.

In-person only evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Recent students who want law enforcement connections like him; .

but quality scores are split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

, and reports of Ds despite solid quiz performance.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Weekly quizzes and but usually short true/false style.

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

Strong field stories for some students; others find lectures boring, quiet, or off-topic.

Format shift

In-person only; opinions are highly polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

than big projects.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and lectures, real-world CJ stories, but frequent complaints about boring delivery and .

Main concern

, and quizzes that feel mismatched to study material.

What students said

“There is a quiz every class but its on material covered the prior class. My advice if he WRITES IT ON THE BOARD its on the QUIZ.”
V18
“He does not utilize any online sources, such as Canvas, so it's impossible to check grades.”
CJV01
“ matching exactly what you were to study for.”
CJV27

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes every class from prior lectures and board writing; exams are simple if you studied what he said.

Weekly quizzesBoard notes on testsMultiple examsLecture-based

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Weekly quizzes from lectures and whiteboard notes; several exams described as simple if you study his cues.

Weekly quizzesWhiteboard notes on quizzes5 exams reported
“There is a quiz every class but its on material covered the prior class. My advice if he WRITES IT ON THE BOARD its on the QUIZ.”
V18
“There are , but it is college, so it should be no surprise. 5 exams, but all of them are simple and easy.”
CJV01

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He does not utilize any online sources, such as Canvas, so it's impossible to check grades. He also gives a , so !”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 in-person reviews spanning 2005-2021, weighing polarized themes. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“Peter teaches his class from experience which makes it so much more interesting.”

⚠️

32/100

“he grades you without telling you the reason why you got that score”

📝

40/100

“Has quizzes every week. The .”

👍 When It Works

70/100

“If you're looking to be in law enforcement or !!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He has an extensive criminal justice background, which he relates to course material.
  • Sometimes gets distracted when giving lessons.
  • His lectures are beyond boring.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • HE WRITES DOWN THE NOTES ON HE WHITEBOARD COPY THEM DONE BECAUSE THEY WILL BE ON THE TESTQUIZZES
  • hard teacher, went to class everyday did alright in the test and quizez but still got a D
  • .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Course Ops

  • does not utilize any online sources, such as Canvas, so it's impossible to check grades
  • you have to turn in the hmwk right when u walk in if u wait 10 mins he wont accept it

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

27 reviews over many years with strong polarization and many sparse older comments reduce consistency.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 57
3 out of 52
2 out of 56
1 out of 56

Course coverage

CJV016 reviews
CJV274 reviews
CJ012 reviews
CJCJ2 reviews
CJV252 reviews
Show 11 more courses
CJ271 review
CJINTR1 review
CJV081 review
CJV161 review
CRMINPROB1 review
PAROLE1 review
PAROLEPROB1 review
PROBPAR1 review
PROBPARO1 review
PROPATIONPAR1 review
V181 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 2

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1