AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Shubhangi Simhan

MATHVO3018 · MATHV44 · V44 · MATH32 · MATHV02 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid if you have any alternative; you will likely teach yourself the entire course.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to understand accentSelf-taught courseTest heavyLots of homeworkFast confusing lectures
  • Every review is a 1/5: thick accent and fast pace make lectures nearly unintelligible.
  • Students , and .
  • and ; many urge finding another section.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Even motivated students self-teach and still report Cs, Fs, and .

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

, and test-heavy load make the content feel much harder than it should.

In-person only.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

and tags warn that skipping means you will not pass.

In-person only.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

and unanimous language to .

In-person only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

and C- outcomes, and students who did all work still struggled.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Lots of homework and test-heavy tags dominate; .

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

Students cannot understand lectures, get upset when asking questions, and call the class incoherent.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

rather than projects.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

All six in-person reviews describe and homework, and regret.

Main concern

Accent and pace make learning from class nearly impossible; .

What students said

“I basically taught myself the entire semester. She is a horrible professor.”
MATHVO3018
“ my entire life.”
MATH32
“her VERY thick accent made her impossible to understand.”
MATHV02

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are high-stakes while lectures do not prepare students well, so .

Test heavyLots of homeworkHard to prepare from lectures

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews emphasize test-heavy grading with little usable lecture support for .

Test heavyMust self-study for tests
“Need to study in and if you want to pass her class.”
MATHV44
“very hard to understand goes through lecture way to fast”
V44

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I basically taught myself the entire semester. She is a horrible professor. It's nothing personal. She just has a very thick accent and is very difficult to understand”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 fully negative in-person reviews with high thematic consistency. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

8/100

“ my entire life.”

🚫 Recommendation

5/100

“ .”

📖

15/100

“I basically taught myself the entire semester.”

🗣️ Communication Barrier

10/100

“her VERY thick accent made her impossible to understand.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • very hard to understand goes through lecture way to fast
  • She wasn't capable of explaining material clearly
  • she gets upset when you ask questions

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Need to study in and if you want to pass her class.
  • Almost everyone dropped the class.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only 6 reviews but they are fully consistent across years with detailed negative evidence.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATHV022 reviews
MATH321 review
MATHV441 review
MATHVO30181 review
V441 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2