AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Robert Vrtis

MATHV05 · MATHV04 · MATHV10 · MATHVO1 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
14.29%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

unless you can teach yourself math and tolerate poor support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProRude and unhelpfulMissed the finalPoor explanationsTough graderLots of homework
  • Most students describe rude, unhelpful teaching and .
  • Multiple reviews say he missed the final and did the bare minimum online.
  • One outlier found an easy A with notes, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

42/100

Grades range from easy A with notes to F and ; an A is not reliably easy.

Online students still reported A or A- despite poor teaching; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Math difficulty is moderate, but rushed explanations and alone.

Online difficulty ratings are higher; one in-person review called MATHV04 easy.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Some sections mark attendance mandatory, others optional, with .

; several in-person reviews say yes.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Six of seven reviews strongly warn against taking him for rudeness and weak teaching.

; only one in-person review is positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Tags and comments cite , and students feeling punished.

Format shift

Tough grader tags appear online; comment.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students report lots of , and test-heavy structure.

Format shift

; online focuses on tests and quizzes.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Dominant theme is no teaching skill, rudeness, missing finals, and learning nothing.

Format shift

Online and .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

Work often runs through external sites with tests, pop quizzes, and .

Format shift

Online and in-person both emphasize tests; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews mostly slam , and poor people skills, with one easy-A outlier.

Main concern

Goes too fast, grades hard, and makes students feel stupid for asking help.

What students said

“terrible teacher not people person doesn't explain cant find him after class hes rude”
MATHV10
“Pretty boring, but easy A.”
MATHV04

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students call him rude, sloppy, and disengaged, including missing the final.

Main concern

Unreliable presence and minimal teaching effort online.

What students said

“He is the !”
MATHV05
“Is hard on being on time, but then shows up 45 minutes late and counting for the final.”
MATHV05

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and ; one section allowed notes, but overall process felt harsh and poorly supported.

Test heavyPop quizzesNotes allowed in one sectionExternal homework site

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and homework; one class reviewed answers beforehand and allowed notes.

Test heavyLots of homeworkNotes allowed (one section)
“you review basically the answers on the you get to use your notes.”
MATHV04
“He didn't show up to the final.”
MATHV05

Online

Online reviews mention test-heavy work and a but .

Test heavyPop quizzesMissed final
“Dare I mention that he missed the final!?”
MATHV05
“shows up 45 minutes late and counting for the final.”
MATHV05

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is the !”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting poor teaching, reliability issues, and one easy-A outlier. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“No teaching skills what so ever. Not a good people person, really odd guy.”

👎 Recommendation

12/100

“I learned nothing and .”

⚠️ Reliability Issues

10/100

“He didn't show up to the final.”

📈 Rare Easy A

70/100

“Pretty boring, but easy A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lessons were sloppy
  • he just goes so fast and
  • No teaching skills what so ever

Theme 2

😤 About Character

  • extremely rude, inconsiderate
  • makes you feel stupid if you ask for help
  • Not a good people person

Theme 3

📈 About Grades & Work

  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK
  • easy A

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews are limited but highly consistent on negative teaching, with .

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATHV053 reviews
MATHV042 reviews
MATHV101 review
MATHVO11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 2 · A- 2

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values