AI Rate Professor

Learning Skills

Peter Sezzi

LIBV01 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Stay away unless required; expect an exhausting, high-volume class with little teaching payoff.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerOverwhelming WorkloadTest HeavyEndless ReadingBoring ContentAvoid This Class
  • Both reviews rate quality 1 and difficulty 5 with .
  • , and test weight.
  • Students say content is boring and poorly explained for the time demanded.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Students report failing or C outcomes amid extreme workload and .

Both online and and poor results.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

Content volume is called irrational and ; difficulty ratings are maxed out.

Both formats agree the course is extremely hard due to volume.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

In-person review marks attendance mandatory; but workload still forces constant engagement.

Mandatory is explicit for in-person; online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

and tell others to stay far away.

and in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Grades reported are C and F under test-heavy, high-volume conditions with no leniency described.

Format shift

Harsh outcomes appear in both formats.

Workload

Overwhelming

8/100

Tags and comments cite lots of , and 12-15 hours per week.

Format shift

In-person quantifies weekly hours; online emphasizes endless reading volume.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students say material is boring, poorly simplified, and not taught in a way that supports real learning.

Format shift

Negative teaching tone is consistent online and in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

and reading, so exams dominate while prep volume stays high.

Format shift

Test-heavy tag is from in-person; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and expect 12-15 hours weekly of reading and videos.

Main concern

Extreme .

What students said

“Stay far away for enrolling in this class. Expect to spend 12-15 hours a and watching videos.”
LIBV01

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online LIBV01 is called the most boring online class with endless scrolling content and .

Main concern

Huge volume of dry material with weak teaching clarity.

What students said

“This is by far the most boring online class Ive ever taken.”
LIBV01

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not detail proctoring tools, but .

Test HeavyHeavy Reading PrepHigh Workload

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

massive weekly reading and video load.

Test HeavyLots of HomeworkGet Ready to Read
“Expect to spend 12-15 hours a and watching videos.”
LIBV01

Online

Online review ; it stresses endless reading and poor explanation.

Heavy ReadingLots of Homework
“The amount of information that he presents is irrational and is literally countless pages of scrolling through boring information.”
LIBV01

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Stay far away for enrolling in this class. Expect to spend 12-15 hours a and watching videos.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting overload, boredom, and . Credibility rating: Low.

🚫

8/100

“Stay far away for enrolling in this class.”

📚 Overwhelming Workload

8/100

“Expect to spend 12-15 hours a and watching videos.”

😴 Boring Delivery

12/100

“This is by far the most boring online class Ive ever taken.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of homework
  • Test heavy
  • F

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • countless pages of scrolling through boring information

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two consistently negative reviews exist, so but sample size is small.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

LIBV012 reviews

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values