AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Jennifer Parker

CD64 · CDCD64 · CD24 · CDV6164AB63 · CDALL · CDV61 · CD61 · CDV63 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
1.9

The decision

if you can self-manage deadlines and tolerate disorganization, because grades can feel easy yet communication is unreliable.

Best fit · Easy A HunterDisorganizedLate gradingEasy contentUnresponsive emailsPersonal tangents
  • Course content is usually easy and low-stress
  • , and
  • Some students love her experience-based style while others report unfair or delayed outcomes

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Multiple students call it an easy A or low-difficulty class even when they dislike her management.

Online and ; online is one recent A+ with frustration.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Average difficulty is low and comments emphasize light academic challenge more than hard concepts.

Both formats describe easy content; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

52/100

one online note of mandatory participation.

; most in-person reviews do not clearly document policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Older fans call her amazing, but repeated unresponsiveness and disorganization drag recommendations down.

The only explicit recent online vote is no; in-person opinions are split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Work is and disputed final grades create fairness concerns.

Format shift

Online reports months-late grading; and harsh grade surprises.

Workload

Light

74/100

Students generally report little homework and manageable assignments.

Format shift

Both formats describe light academic load.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Strong field knowledge and and poor communication.

Format shift

Online is more negative on process; in-person is polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Comments emphasize papers, assignments, and limited .

Format shift

; online stresses assignment deadlines.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and help versus complaints about disorganization, missing returned work, and poor email response.

Main concern

and inconsistent organization.

What students said

“Disorganized but that makes her...well...her. She's a wonderful professor and knows her field so well.”
CDV6164AB63
“Horrible teacher do not reccomend! She is so unorganized and never had an agenda”
CDV63
“I emailed her probly 20 times... She never even got back to me!”
CDV61

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

The single online review calls the class easy but finds strict deadlines paired with and writing nitpicks frustrating.

Main concern

and mismatched writing expectations.

What students said

“Easy class, aggravating teacher.”
CD61

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is usually assignment-heavy with limited formal exams, but and .

Few in-class testsAssignment focusedLate grading risk

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students report few in-class tests and .

No in class testsFinal flexibilityAssignment heavy
“there was no in class tests and for turn in anything we may have not turned in.”
CDV63

Online

Online evidence focuses on strict assignment deadlines rather than proctored exams.

Strict deadlinesAssignment based
“She has strict deadlines for assignments but doesn't grade them until months later.”
CD61

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy class, aggravating teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews (1 online, 14 in person), highlighting easy course load versus communication and organization risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“Jennifer is amazing!!! ”

⚠️ Organization Issues

35/100

“She is so unorganized and never had an agenda on what we were going to do in class.”

📈 Easy Content

84/100

“Always an easy A for me.”

📬 Communication Gaps

30/100

“I emailed her probly 20 times... She never even got back to me!”

Theme 1

❤️ About Character

  • awesome, amazing teacher
  • She's great. Knows the subject WELL
  • Wounderful Teacher! Take as many classes as you can with her

Theme 2

📉

  • Can not be trusted

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy class, aggravating teacher
  • not too uch home work. Always an easy A for me
  • I got 100% on everything but

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews cover many years but opinions conflict sharply and .

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CD643 reviews
CDV613 reviews
CDV633 reviews
CD612 reviews
CD241 review
Show 3 more courses
CDALL1 review
CDCD641 review
CDV6164AB631 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values