AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

James Crowley

PHIL01 · PHILLOGI · PHILVO1 · INTROLOGIC · INTROPHIL · INTROTOPHIL · PHIL1 · PHILO · PHILV05 · PHIL1A · PHIL3435 · PHILVO5 · PHILV01 · PHIL5 · PHILOSOPHY · INTROTOPHILOS · PHIL05 · PHILV07 · PHILV04 · LOGICPHIL · PHILV01V04 · 45 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you will read his book and stay on top of discussions; skip if you want an effortless A or .

Best fit · Effort For RewardOwn textbookGet ready to readClear grading criteriaFunny and passionateProctored online tests
  • Many students pass with A/ , and study guides.
  • and messy; intro philosophy is more straightforward.
  • funny and inspirational to some, rant-heavy or biased to others.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

Many report easy As if and study questions, but some say you still work for the grade.

Online intro often feels easier; logic and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

Intro philosophy is usually approachable; symbolic logic and .

Online PHIL01/V01 is often easier; V04/V05 and logic skew harder.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Some sections mark attendance mandatory or weekly discussions required; others are flexible online.

Online discussions often count as participation; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

67/100

About two-thirds would take again; praise for passion and .

Stronger love/hate split in older in-person reviews; online is mixed but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Generous scale and dropped low scores appear often; still not free for .

Format shift

; some in-person tests felt hard.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Weekly discussions and reading are steady; some call it lots of homework and .

Format shift

Online workload surprises unprepared students; in person varies by course.

Teaching experience

Good

66/100

Many praise passion, humor, and clarity; others cite rants, bias, or little teaching online.

Format shift

In person teaching personality is stronger; .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Discussions, chapter questions, and multi-choice or timed exams all matter.

Format shift

; in person adds lectures and occasional essays.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person he is often funny, passionate, and lecture-heavy; grades can be fair if you do the book questions, though .

Main concern

Political tangents and uneven lecture focus for some students.

What students said

“Mr. Crowley was the most woke and honest teacher I've had.”
PHILV01
“ .”
PHILVO5
“NOT AN EASY A if thats what youre looking for, but it is an interesting class”
PHILV07

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

; many call it easy if you study questions, but organization and self-teaching complaints appear especially in logic.

Main concern

and occasional chaotic course setup.

What students said

“ . Easy with minimal work. I got an A and totally bombed most tests, 5 in all, lowest score dropped.”
PHILV01
“ and make flashcards for the exams from the study questions and you're fine!”
PHIL01
“There is no teaching from the professor. ”
PHILV04

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams range from study-guide driven and .

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; some are open note and study-guide based, others described as hard.

Open note testsStudy guide questions on testsMulti-choice tests
“ .”
PHILVO5
“All the questions that you are answering are going to be on the test”
PHILV01
“ . STUDY!!!!”
INTROTOPHIL

Online

Online exams are often timed and proctored, drawn from chapter study questions, with lowest score sometimes dropped.

Proctored testsTimed examsStudy questions map to testsLowest score dropped
“ . Easy with minimal work.”
PHILV01
“Average of 33 questions; 30 minutes per test. 1 try.”
PHILV01
“Highlight the answers to all the questions and you have the answers to the tests”
PHILV01

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Just do the discussions and take the exams... , just discussions boards and exams!”

Voice snapshots generated from 45 reviews across online and in-person philosophy sections. Credibility rating: High.

📖 Read His Book, You're Fine

75/100

“participate in and you will have no problem earning "A"”

🎯 Teaching Passion

70/100

“GREAT teacher! Very interesting and passionate.”

🧭

72/100

“This class was very straight forward, read the chapters, answer the questions in the chapter review and review them for the exams.”

⚠️ Polarizing Personality

40/100

“ . Take philosphy with the other teachers. You have been warned.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • One of the funniest teachers i've ever had.
  • He's out there!
  • Mr. Crowley was the most woke and honest teacher I've had.
  • occasionally goes off topic

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • NOT AN EASY A if thats what youre looking for
  • Very easy class.
  • I got a B but i worked hard for it

Theme 3

💻

  • .
  • make flashcards for the
  • Average of 33 questions; 30 minutes per test. 1 try.

Theme 4

📚 About His Textbook

  • You do have to buy his book for the class
  • he wrote the text and it is easy to read
  • Purchase on campus, inexpensive, but a great read!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

45

Recent reviews read by the AI

45

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

45 reviews spanning many years with both formats, grade reports, and consistent themes support high credibility.

Inside 45 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 515
3 out of 56
2 out of 55
1 out of 56

Course coverage

PHILV0113 reviews
PHILV045 reviews
PHIL014 reviews
PHILVO53 reviews
PHILLOGI2 reviews
Show 16 more courses
PHILO2 reviews
PHILV052 reviews
INTROLOGIC1 review
INTROPHIL1 review
INTROTOPHIL1 review
INTROTOPHILOS1 review
LOGICPHIL1 review
PHIL051 review
PHIL11 review
PHIL1A1 review
PHIL34351 review
PHIL51 review
PHILOSOPHY1 review
PHILV01V041 review
PHILV071 review
PHILVO11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 2 · A 8

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2