AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Wayne Snyder

CNSEM05 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want engaged instruction and current networking material; the review describes a disengaged, low-value online course.

Best fit · Self Taught ProInattentive feedbackOutdated textbooksLow-effort assignmentsOverqualified disengagedAvoid online section
  • The single review is , and material currency.
  • Assignments are described as rewrite-the-paragraph busywork from 15-year-old networking texts.
  • -.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

The student still earned an A-, and work is described as shallow rewrite tasks, so the grade path looks attainable despite poor teaching.

All evidence is from the single online review.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Difficulty is mid-range; content seems shallow rather than intellectually hard, but disengagement makes learning poor.

Course difficulty is based only on the one online review.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

90/100

class.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

and frames the class as low-value, overqualified disengagement.

Recommendation is based solely on the single online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

65/100

An A- was earned, but as skimmed and low-investment rather than generously coaching.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

75/100

Assignments sound light and low-rigor, including rewrite-the-paragraph style tasks.

Format shift

Workload description is only from the online review.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Student says he would rather be anywhere else, skims answers, and teaches outdated material.

Format shift

Teaching judgment rests entirely on one online review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment appears assignment-driven with rewrite-style work and .

Format shift

Assessment clues are only from the online review; exams are not described.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One online CNSEM05 review calls him inattentive, outdated, and low-effort with .

Main concern

Teaching off 15-year-old textbooks and .

What students said

“He's inattentive and .”
CNSEM05

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; only low-effort assignment work is described.

Assignment basedRewrite tasksNo exam details

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

and rewrite-paragraph assignments, with no webcam or exam proctoring details.

Paper feedbackRewrite assignmentsNo exam policy stated
“some of and re-write it".”
CNSEM05

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“It feels like Wayne Snyder would much rather be doing anything else. He's inattentive and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 online review detailing disengagement and outdated networking materials. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“It feels like Wayne Snyder would much rather be doing anything else.”

📚 Outdated Materials

20/100

“He teaches off 15 year old textbooks (in networking/IT that's heresy)”

👎 Recommendation

10/100

“No”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's inattentive and .
  • He's over qualified and shows it.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • some of and re-write it".
  • A-

Theme 3

📚 About Materials

  • He teaches off 15 year old textbooks (in networking/IT that's heresy)

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Only one detailed online review exists, so the but far too thin for high confidence.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CNSEM051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values