AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

Karen Jossel

ART70994 · 70A · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you can teach yourself software; expect uneven tech support and mixed online experiences.

Best fit · Self Taught ProNot Tech SavvyExtra CreditInconsistent FeedbackLecture HeavyAccessible Outside Class
  • Reviews split sharply between strong praise and harsh criticism of tech skills.
  • Online students either loved her feedback or .
  • In-person students report rambling lectures and weak computer teaching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

65/100

and an A+ appear, but other students still struggle when instruction is weak.

and grades; in-person review is more negative on teaching quality.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Difficulty consistently rated around 3/5; content is doable if .

Both online and in-person reviews report moderate difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

At least one online and the as mandatory.

Online and ; one online review did not specify.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

One enthusiastic yes and multiple would-not-take-again or low quality scores leave a split verdict.

Online is split 5 vs 1 quality; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

and + and B+ grades.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize and .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Lecture-heavy with self-directed software learning; workload is moderate rather than crushing.

Format shift

In-person students spend class waiting and ; online details are thinner.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Tech struggles, rambling lessons, and .

Format shift

; in-person computer teaching is widely panned.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Graphic arts focus with , and lecture-heavy structure rather than big exams.

Format shift

Neither format clearly describes formal exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person graphic arts students wait through rambling and often learn software from YouTube instead.

Main concern

Weak computer skills and wasted class time.

What students said

“We spent the entire class period waiting for her to start the lesson but she rambles that you are left looking up how to do it yourself.”
ART70994

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

one student loved same-day replies and .

Main concern

Slow or .

What students said

“I loved her, she always replied to me within the day. and did remarkably well .”
70A
“Jossel is not very tech savvy and .”
70A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and rather than formal proctored exams.

Extra CreditProject Feedback

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person review focuses on software demos and .

Lecture Heavy
“A YouTube tutorial can give you better lessons.”
ART70994

Online

Online reviews ; focus is on feedback and email response.

Extra CreditClear Grading Criteria
“ and did remarkably well .”
70A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“A YouTube tutorial can give you better lessons.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting tech struggles and . Credibility rating: Medium.

💻 Tech Skills Gap

30/100

“Karen is not at all very good with the computer she tries to teach you on.”

📬 Communication Split

45/100

“she always replied to me within the day”

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Jossel is not very tech savvy and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she rambles that you are left looking up how to do it yourself
  • A YouTube tutorial can give you better lessons

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • A+

Theme 3

📧 About Communication

  • always replied to me within the day

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Three reviews from 2016-2018 with and some detail, but small sample.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

70A2 reviews
ART709941 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1