AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Carissa Romero

MATHV44 · V44 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you will attend, do the work, and want a a free ride.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and accessibleTough grader with extra creditTest corrections allowedClear expectationsMixed communication
  • Most students praise her care, accessibility, and willingness to help weak math learners until the end.
  • Exams carry the most weight, but and .
  • One strong critique , and reading from the book instead of explaining.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

You can earn a solid grade with effort because of and , but she is tagged a tough grader and exams count most.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Stats content is approachable with her help, yet difficulty ratings and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Two of and students must show up and do the assignments.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Two of , while one would not due to prep and communication issues.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Tagged tough grader with clear criteria, but and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Regular assignments plus high-stakes exams; manageable if you keep up, not featherlight.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Strong praise for care and one-on-one help, offset by one review calling her unprepared and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Students stress that exams mean most, with assignments and as support.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person stats students split between loving her hands-on help and disliking poor prep and .

Main concern

Attendance and , and communication quality can lag.

What students said

“Unlike other professors, she understands that not everyone is great at math. and and out of class.”
MATHV44
“Exams mean most. Do well the first time and there's no .”
V44
“She needs to prepare about the class more than that. She didn't give me the perfect answers about the .”
V44

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but corrections and make the policy more recoverable than pure high-stakes testing.

Exams weighted heaviestTest corrections allowedExtra credit available

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and extra credit as safety nets.

Exams mean mostTest correctionsExtra credit
“Exams mean most. Do well the first time and there's no .”
V44
“There are opportunities and .”
MATHV44

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Unlike other professors, she understands that not everyone is great at math. and and out of class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 , and communication concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

❤️ Caring Support

78/100

“I'm a horrible math student and she worked closely with me to turn it around”

📝

72/100

“Exams mean most. Do well the first time and there's no .”

⚠️ Prep and Communication Gaps

35/100

“She didn't give me the perfect answers about the . And she is not really good at communication.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Willing to work w/ you until the very end
  • Lets you know right away what she expects
  • She just read the book about what I asked

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • There are opportunities and

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • and and out of class
  • Easily one of
  • She is a good person, but that doesn't mean she's a good professor

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Only three detailed 2018 in-person reviews with mixed but specific themes; small sample limits confidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

V442 reviews
MATHV441 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values