AI Rate Professor

English

Loren Qualls

ENGV01A · ENGLV01A · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

; students report almost no teaching and grades that do not match effort.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHorrible TeacherOff TopicTough GraderUnpreparedFunny but Ineffective
  • Students call him the
  • Class time wasted on personal stories, earbuds, and lateness
  • Harsh or

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even perfect essays can become a C if the ; .

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content itself is not described as intellectually brutal; the problem is teaching quality, not course depth.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Both reviews report mandatory attendance with little learning value during class time.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Zero would-take-again and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

; one student got As on essays yet finished with a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

58/100

Graded by few things with essays and a .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students while lecturing, and students teaching half the class.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

more than steady coursework.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

as a complete joke with off-topic lectures and .

Main concern

No real instruction and grades that can collapse over a .

What students said

“HORRIBLE teacher. Does not help or . Got off topic everyday in class.”
ENGLV01A
“Wore earbuds while lecturing, talked about his ex, talked about himself, showed up late, literally had me teach the class 50% of the time.”
ENGV01A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

essays are strong.

High-Stakes FinalFew Graded ItemsTough Grading

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

single final question able to wreck the course grade.

High-Stakes FinalFew Graded ItemsTough Grading
“I and ended up with a C in the class because I missed one question on the final.”
ENGV01A
“HORRIBLE teacher. Does not help or .”
ENGLV01A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The . Wore earbuds while lecturing, talked about his ex, talked about himself, showed up late, literally had me teach the class 50% of the time.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews with consistent severe criticism of teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Teaching Disaster

12/100

“HORRIBLE teacher. Does not help or . Got off topic everyday in class.”

⚖️

18/100

“I and ended up with a C in the class because I missed one question on the final.”

👎

8/100

“A cool individual but a terrible terrible teacher. .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Got off topic everyday in class.
  • Wore earbuds while lecturing, talked about his ex, talked about himself, showed up late
  • literally had me teach the class 50% of the time.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I and ended up with a C in the class because I missed one question on the final.
  • The class was a complete joke.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews from 2017-2018; both are strongly negative and detailed, but sample size is very small.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGLV01A1 review
ENGV01A1 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values